Metal ring repelled from AC coaxial coil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of a metal ring being repelled by a solenoid with alternating current, attributed to mutual inductance. The induced electromotive force (emf) in the ring, as described by Faraday's Law of Induction, results from the changing magnetic flux due to the solenoid's alternating current. This induced emf generates a current in the ring, creating a magnetic field that opposes the solenoid's field, leading to repulsion as per Lenz's Law. The mathematical representation of this process is given by the equation emf = -N * ΔΦ/Δt, where N is the number of turns in the solenoid and ΔΦ/Δt is the rate of change of magnetic flux. The explanation emphasizes the interaction between the solenoid's magnetic field and the induced magnetic field in the ring, confirming the reasoning behind the observed repulsion.
nvalentour
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I thought people helped on this forum?

If anything is unclear just ask, I'm checking for posts every minute. Come on people I have to get this done by 5 pm. I've gotten a little further. I believe it has something to do with mutual inductance.

A metal ring (no current) is brought close to a solonoid (coil with n turns), the solonoid has an alternating current running through it; explain using equations why the ring is repelled. (the ring is directly above the axis of the solonoid).

I think the di/dt of the coil induces an emf in the ring that follows Lenz's Induction Law and in turn creates a magnetic field with polarities facing each other, so they repel. I need this in equation form though. (Is my reasoning even correct?)... Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation representing the phenomena is Faraday's Law of Induction:$$\mathcal{E} = - N \frac{d\Phi}{dt}$$where $\mathcal{E}$ is the induced emf, $N$ is the number of turns of the coil, and $\Phi$ is the magnetic flux. As the current in the coil changes, the rate of change of the magnetic flux also changes, and this induces an emf in the ring which opposes the change in flux and thus creates a repulsive force between the two objects.
 


Hello,

First of all, I want to assure you that people on this forum are always willing to help and provide assistance. It is possible that some may not have seen your post yet, or may not have the expertise to answer your question. I encourage you to be patient and give others a chance to respond.

Now, let's address your question. You are on the right track with your reasoning. The phenomenon you are describing is known as mutual inductance, which occurs when a changing magnetic field in one coil induces an emf in a nearby coil. This is described by Faraday's Law of Induction, which states that the induced emf is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil.

In this case, the alternating current in the solenoid creates a changing magnetic field, which in turn induces an emf in the metal ring. This emf creates a current in the ring, which in turn creates its own magnetic field. According to Lenz's Law, this induced magnetic field will oppose the changing magnetic field that created it. Since the changing magnetic field in the solenoid is above the ring, the induced magnetic field in the ring will be in the opposite direction, resulting in repulsion between the two.

This can be expressed mathematically using the following equation:

emf = -N * ΔΦ/Δt

Where emf is the induced emf, N is the number of turns in the solenoid, and ΔΦ/Δt is the rate of change of magnetic flux through the solenoid.

I hope this helps to clarify your understanding. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Good luck with your project!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top