Meter Conversion: Rs, Rm, Rt, %Ig, %Is

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blu3eyes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meter
AI Thread Summary
To convert a galvanometer with a coil resistance of 460 Ohms and a full-scale deflection current of 100 µA into an ammeter for 200 mA, a shunt resistance of approximately 230.115 mOhms is required. The total current is divided between the galvanometer and the shunt resistor, with the galvanometer receiving 100 µA and the shunt carrying the remainder. The voltage across the galvanometer can be calculated as 92.046 V, which is essential for determining the ammeter's total resistance. The discussion emphasizes the current divider principle to understand how the current splits between the two paths. This analysis is crucial for accurate ammeter conversion and understanding current distribution in parallel circuits.
Blu3eyes
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A galvanometer has a coil resistance of 460 Ohms and a full scale deflection current of 100 uA. What shunt resistance is needed to convert this galvanometer into an ammeter which has a full scale deflection current of 200 mA. What is the resistance of the ammeter when it is completed? What percentage of the current flows thru the galvanometer? What percentage of the current flows thru the shunt?

Homework Equations


Rs=IgRg/(I - Ig)
Rm=V/Ig - Rg
Rt=V/Ig or Rg + Rm

The Attempt at a Solution


Rs= 100 uA x 460 Ohms/ (200 mA - 100 uA) =230.115 mOhms

Rm=V/Ig - Rg
Rt=V/Ig or Rg + Rm , either case I don't have V

%Ig=??
%Is=??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The galvanometer and shunt resistor form a simple current divider. How do currents divide between two parallel resistive branches?
 
So, is the current = 200.1 mA and the V=92.046 V.
 
Blu3eyes said:
So, is the current = 200.1 mA and the V=92.046 V.

No. It's a current divider that is dividing 200 mA through two paths. One is the galvanometer, which should have 100 μA for full scale deflection, and the rest through the shunt resistor.

Given a current I and two parallel resistances R1 and R2, what's the formula for predicting the current through, say, R1?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top