Method of Joints: Struggling to Understand?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the method of joints in structural analysis, specifically regarding non-symmetrical triangles. The key principle is that the sum of all forces at any joint must equal zero, with all members acting as two-force members. This ensures that there are no torques acting on the structure, preventing rotation. To apply the method, one should start at a joint where all unknowns can be solved and then proceed to adjacent joints. The explanation emphasizes the importance of identifying reaction forces before analyzing individual joints.
Satoy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am struggleing here. Can anyone explain this concept to me? I don't understand how to first find the forces the supports exort and even if I did I don't know I I could proceed. Does anyone know a website that has a non-symetrical triangle that I can re-learn the basics off of. Or if some one on here could explain it to me that would be great.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
never mind I found a website before I even got one view...thanks anyways
 
The only point to the method of joints is that the sum of all forces at ANY joint MUST equal to zero. In addition, all the memebers of the structure are two force memebers, and any forces that act on the structure MUST act on a JOINT. This makes good practical sense when you think about it too. If a member were NOT a two force memeber, then there would be a torque as well. And since there are no external torques to cancel out this natrual torque, the member would have rotation. So the ONLY force can be a two force, which means the forces are in the direction of the structual members.
When you do the method of joints, you start from whichever joint you can solve for all the unkowns, and then you work your way to the next joint, once you have figured out the forces in some of the members, until you find whatever force you were asked to find. (Sometimes it is necessary to look at the entire structure first to find the reaction forces so that you can first find a joint to work with though!).
I hope that helps.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top