Method of undetermined coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The method of undetermined coefficients is being applied to solve the differential equation 2y'' + y' = cos(2x) + 4x + 1. The user successfully determined the particular solution for cos(2x) but is uncertain about the appropriate guess for the particular solution corresponding to the polynomial 4x + 1. It is noted that if the auxiliary equation has a root of 0, the particular integral should be of a degree higher than the polynomial on the right side. Therefore, the suggested form for the particular integral should be a quadratic polynomial, specifically Ax^2 + Bx + C. This approach ensures that the method aligns with the rules of undetermined coefficients for polynomials.
s7b
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,

When using the method of undetermined coefficients to solve

2y'' + y' = cos(2x) + 4x + 1

I did it term by term. I figured out the first yp1 for the cos(2x). I'm just not sure what to "guess" as to the form of the yp2 for 4x+1

Does anyone know what to use as the guess?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
when you solved the auxilary equation if one root was 0, then for a polynomial, the particular integral would be a degree higher. For example if you solved and 0 was a root of the aux. eq'n. and the right side was ax+b, then the PI would be Ax^2+Bx+C
 
It is easy to know what to guess.
[D^2+2^2]cos(2x)=0
[D^2](4x+1)=0
Guess the solution to lcm{[2D^2+D],[D^2],[D^2+2^2]}=[D^2][2D+1][D^2+2^2]
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top