Methods to measure the speed of the light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on methods to measure the speed of light, specifically referencing Fizeau's experimental setup. Participants express confusion about the tools used by Fizeau, particularly regarding time measurement and the use of a spinning wheel with holes. Clarifications indicate that Fizeau's method does not require explicit time measurement, as it is derived from the equations used. There is also a side conversation about the appropriateness of resurrecting old threads in the forum, with guidance provided on maintaining forum etiquette. Overall, the thread highlights both historical measurement techniques and community norms for discussion participation.
honolulu_boy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I would like to know what are the differents methods to measure the speed of the light.

Thanks
:smile:
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well I have a problem to understand how Fizeau made his measurements ! What were his tools to measure time ?
 
Probably crystals, counting the number of vibrations.
 
zhermes said:
Probably crystals, counting the number of vibrations.

How he made the counting ?
 
Don't know. Some sort of electronics... maybe piezoelectrics.
 
I don't understand why there is always so few indications on experimental setup in Physic
 
honolulu_boy said:
I don't understand why there is always so few indications on experimental setup in Physic

The experimental set-ups are generally very well described in the published paper(s) that result from the experiment. This is done so that others can reproduce the experiment, if need be.
 
  • #10
Geezer said:
Didn't Fizeau use some spinning wheel with holes in it?
Good catch Geezer, my apologies---I was thinking about something entirely different. Fizeau's apparatus doesn't need to measure the time explicitly, it drops out of the equations. My bad.
 
  • #11
For God's sake!
Piezoelectrics in 1800's??
Mirrors and spinning wheels and that's all!
 
  • #12
Any reason you felt compelled to mention this after almost 2 years had passed?
 
  • #13
well, if you check my registration date you will see that it is roughly a week. Since then, I have been scrolling down all forums to find topics that interest me the most. Therefore, despite the time that has passed since the last post I wanted to comment.
 
  • #14
e.chaniotakis said:
well, if you check my registration date you will see that it is roughly a week. Since then, I have been scrolling down all forums to find topics that interest me the most. Therefore, despite the time that has passed since the last post I wanted to comment.

It is generally frowned upon to "resurrect" an old thread. If you have a question about the same topic it is usually better to create a new thread instead, as many of the posters in the original thread may be gone now, and a multi-page thread usually gets far fewer looks than a fresh new one.

PF is not your average forum. We try to maintain high standards in our posts, so bumping an old thread simply because you wanted to comment on it is generally not considered to be a good reason.
 
  • #15
I was not aware of this policy! Thank you for mentioning it to me. From now and on it will be done this way.
 
  • #16
e.chaniotakis said:
I was not aware of this policy! Thank you for mentioning it to me. From now and on it will be done this way.

No problem, everyone's got to learn somehow!
 
Back
Top