Metric Connection from Geodesic Equation

alex3
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
For the following two-dimensional metric

ds^2 = a^2(d\theta^2 + \sin^2{\theta}d\phi^2)

using the Euler-Lagrange equations reveal the following equations of motion

\ddot{\phi} + 2\frac{\cos{\theta}}{\sin{\theta}}\dot{\theta}\dot{\phi} = 0
\ddot{\theta} - \sin{\theta}\cos{\theta}\dot{\phi}^2 = 0

Using the general geodesic equation form \ddot{x}^{\alpha} + \Gamma^{\alpha}_{\beta\gamma}\dot{x}^\beta\dot{x}^{\gamma}=0, we infer that the equations derived describe geodesics. This shows that the only non-zero terms of the metric connection \Gamma^{\alpha}_{\beta\gamma} are

\Gamma^{\theta}_{\phi\phi} = -\sin{\theta}\cos{\theta},\quad \Gamma^{\phi}_{\theta\phi} = \Gamma^{\phi}_{\phi\theta} = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{\sin{\theta}}

My problem is comprehending where the factor of two has gone for the \Gamma^{\phi}_{\phi\theta} term. Is it due to fact that it's a coefficient of a mixed derivative, why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to sum over theta and phi, so the geodesic equation contains the two terms

\Gamma^{\phi}_{\theta\phi}\dot{\theta}\dot{\phi} + \Gamma^{\phi}_{\phi\theta}\dot{\phi}\dot{\theta}
 
Of course! Thank you, it's very clear now.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top