Metric Space, closed ball is a closed set. prove this

Ankit Mishra
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (X, d) be a metric space. The set Y in X , d(x; y) less than equal to r is called a closed set with radius r centred at point X.

Show that a closed ball is a closed set.

Homework Equations



In a topological space, a set is closed if and only if it coincides with its closure. Equivalently, a set is closed if and only if it contains all of its limit points.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea, please help!

What have you tried? There are a few ways to show a set is closed. You can try showing that it contains all of its limit points, or try showing that the complement is open.
 
Remember, what is the definition of a limit point? Have you tried using the second definition of a closed set?
 
Well I wrote that the boundary points in a closed ball are contained, but i don't know how to prove it?
 
The closed about p, of radius r, is defined as \{ q| d(p, q)\le r\}. What are the boundary points of that set?
 
Here is my proof. I would appreciate any comments. Assuming it's correct, I like this proof because it doesn't require knowledge of sequences.

Let B[x0,ε] be the closed ball.
We will show that this set contains all of its limit points.
Case 1: |B[x0,ε]| < ∞
A finite set contains all of its limit points.
Case 2: Otherwise
Let x' be a limit point of B[x0,ε]. W.t.s. x' is in B[x0,ε].
Suppose x' is not in B[x0,ε]. Then d(x0,x') > ε.
Let γ = 1/2 * (d(x0,x')-ε). Then γ > 0.
Consider the open set B(x',γ). Since x' is a limit point of B[x0,ε], (B(x',γ) intersect B[x0,ε]) - {x'} ≠ null set.
Let a be an element of (B(x',γ) intersect B[x0,ε]) - {x'}.
By definition, d(x0,x') = ε + 2γ.
d(x0,a) + d(x',a) < ε + γ < ε + 2γ = d(x0,x').
By the triangle inequality, d(x0,x') < d(x0,a) + d(x',a).
This is a contradiction.
In all cases, x' is an element of B[x0,ε].

Since B[x0,ε] contains all of its limit points, it is a closed set.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top