octane90
- 2
- 0
I was attempting to find a counterexample to the problem below. I think I may have, but was ultimately left with more questions than answers.
Consider the space, L, of all bounded sequences with the metric \rho_1
\displaystyle \rho_1(x,y)=\sum\limits_{t=1}^{\infty}2^{-t}|x_t-y_t|
Show that a sequence that converges to X^* in (L,\rho_1) does not necessarily converge to X^* in (L,\rho_\infty)
Where, \rho_\infty(x,y)=sup_t|x_t-y_t|.
I believe convergence means:
X converges to Y if \forall \epsilon>0 \exists N s.t. \sum\limits_{t=N}^{\infty}2^{-t}|x_t-y_t|<\epsilon
I believe that x_n=sin (n) converges to the 0 sequence in \rho_1, but not in \rho_\infty. However, it seems like x_n=sin (n) could also be shown to converge to {1,1,1,1,...} under \rho_1 which shouldn't be allowed.
Could anyone help me out?
Consider the space, L, of all bounded sequences with the metric \rho_1
\displaystyle \rho_1(x,y)=\sum\limits_{t=1}^{\infty}2^{-t}|x_t-y_t|
Show that a sequence that converges to X^* in (L,\rho_1) does not necessarily converge to X^* in (L,\rho_\infty)
Where, \rho_\infty(x,y)=sup_t|x_t-y_t|.
I believe convergence means:
X converges to Y if \forall \epsilon>0 \exists N s.t. \sum\limits_{t=N}^{\infty}2^{-t}|x_t-y_t|<\epsilon
I believe that x_n=sin (n) converges to the 0 sequence in \rho_1, but not in \rho_\infty. However, it seems like x_n=sin (n) could also be shown to converge to {1,1,1,1,...} under \rho_1 which shouldn't be allowed.
Could anyone help me out?
Last edited: