Metric variation of the covariant derivative

Theo1808
Messages
1
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi all, I currently have a modified Einstein-Hilbert action, with extra terms coming from some vector field A_\mu = (A_0(t),0,0,0), given by

\mathcal{L}_A = -\frac{1}{2} \nabla _\mu A_\nu \nabla ^\mu A ^\nu +\frac{1}{2} R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu.

The resulting field equation has been given as R_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu \nu} = 8 \pi G (T_{\mu \nu} + T^A _{\mu \nu}) i.e. the same as Einstein's equation but with an extra energy-momentum term coming from A_\mu. I'm trying to find the form of T^A _{\mu \nu} and I only know that the density associated with it (I assume T^A _{00}) is \rho_A = \frac{3}{2}H^2A_0^2+3HA_0 \dot{A}_0 - \frac{1}{2} \dot{A}^2 _0. (The metric used is FRW ds^2 = dt^2 - a^2(t) \delta_{ij}dx^idx^j).

Homework Equations



Searching around has found these (I think) useful relations: \frac{\delta g_{\mu \nu}}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} = -g_{\mu \rho}g_{\nu \sigma}, \frac{A^\mu}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} = 0 and \frac{A_\mu}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} = -g_{\mu \rho}A_\sigma

The Attempt at a Solution



So my problem is getting a analytical equation for variations in the covariant derivative. I can rewrite R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu as \nabla _\mu A^\mu \nabla _\nu A^\nu - \nabla _\mu A^\nu \nabla _\nu A^\mu, so everything is in terms of covariant derivatives. The problem arises with variations in the Christoffel symbols. This gives me terms that are derivatives of \delta g_{\mu \nu}, which I'm not sure how to deal with (ultimately I'd want some expression all multiplied by \delta g^{\rho \sigma}. In the original EH action for example the variations in the connections are in a total derivative so they aren't needed to be evaluated. I tried to see what would happen if I ignored variations in the connection and with T^A _{\mu \nu} = - 2 \frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta g^{\rho \sigma}} + g_{\rho \sigma}\mathcal{L}, which gave me some of the terms in the density, but ultimately I believe I'm missing extra terms. Ignoring the variations in the connection, I get

T^A _{\rho \sigma} = \nabla_\rho A_\nu \nabla_\sigma A^\nu - g^{\mu \beta}\nabla_\mu A_\rho \nabla_\beta A_\sigma -\frac{1}{2} g_{\rho \sigma} g^{\alpha \mu} \nabla _\mu A_\nu \nabla _\alpha A ^\nu +\frac{1}{2} g_{\rho \sigma} R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu.

The R_{\mu \nu} A^\mu A^\nu term gives me (finding the (00) term in T) a -\frac{3}{2}(\dot{H} + H^2)A_0^2 term. I also get that the first 2 terms in T_{00}, after using the substitution of connections in FRW, all cancel out or go to zero. While the third term gives me the -\frac{1}{2} \dot{A}^2 _0 and +\frac{3}{2}H^2A_0^2. The problem is then I'm missing a few terms which I think come from me ignoring variations in the connection.

Thanks for any help you might be able to give me.
 
  • Like
Likes demon
If I am understanding you, you arrive at terms like ∂(δgμν) and you don't know how to factor it in terms of δgμν, is that right?

If so, I recently arrived to the same problem through a different action. Sadly I haven't found an answer yet, so I'll be watching this space... Also, if I find an answer I'll post it here.

By the way, would you mind letting me know where you found the relation
δgμν/δgρσ=−gμρgνσ

Thanks in advance
 
demon said:
By the way, would you mind letting me know where you found the relation
δgμν/δgρσ=−gμρgνσ

Please forget this last point, I got confused with δ and ∂ again...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top