Microfabrication & Flow Cytometer Statistics

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
AI Thread Summary
Microfabrication techniques are being applied to create a flow cytometer on a chip, raising questions about the quality of statistical data compared to traditional larger versions. The discussion highlights concerns about whether using significantly smaller sample sizes, like 1/100th of the typical amount, can still yield reliable statistics. Despite the reduced sample volume, it is noted that even a few hundred particles can provide meaningful statistical insights. In blood samples, even a nanoliter can contain thousands of cells, which is considered sufficient for analysis. However, for critical applications, consulting a mathematician for validation is recommended.
gravenewworld
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
27
I'm taking microfabrication right now and we will be making a flow cytometer on a chip. My question is--are the statistics that come from something microfabricated as good as the larger version? The idea is to use less reagents, materials, and sample, but if you use less sample can you generate the same quality of statistics? A flow cytometer can generate massive amounts of statistics, but if you you use 1/100th of the amount of cells for a cytometer on a chip will your data be as good?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
With even a few hundred "particles" in statistical mechanics things already overwhelmingly favor the dominant configuration and I believe you can just say "its similar for cells".

For blood, 1 microliter contains about 5 million cells, and with microfluidic lab on a chips you're probably looking at somewhere between 1 nanoliter and 1 microliter of fluid, so at minimum you'll have thousands of cells which is probably good enough.

If something really, really big is riding on this and there's a gigantic penalty for failure though don't trust what I say and ask a math guy instead.
 
Back
Top