Microlensing might detect planets as well as MACHOs

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets
AI Thread Summary
Microlensing has successfully detected massive compact halo objects (MACHOs) through gravitational lensing, causing temporary spikes in light curves. This technique, initially explored in the late 1990s to estimate MACHO contributions to dark matter, has potential applications in detecting planets. A new approach suggests that a "double spike" microlensing effect could identify Earth-sized and larger planets, where a planet's signal appears as a smaller blip on a broader light curve caused by a star. However, the detection rate for such planets would be low due to their orbital alignment requirements. The discussion highlights ongoing interest in microlensing as a tool for both dark matter and planetary research.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
massive compact halo objects have been detected by microlensing

an invisible compact object passing in front of a distant source causes a temporary spike in the light curve by gravitational lensing---the brightening might last a couple of days

this was written about in the late 1990s when they wanted an upper bound on the contribution of MACHO to dark matter and a bunch of invisible massive objects were observed

but wait! the story isn't over apparently. I recently came across a page of some people who think they can detect earth-size and larger-size planets by a "double spike" microlensing effect.

the star causes a large broad blip in the lightcurve and the planet causes a smaller sharp blip superimposed on it.

I cannot vouch for this. It may not be a reliable webpage. It has a lot of links to established microlensing searches and established planet searches, so it might be a useful page as well as being a curiosity. The page is called "Microlensing Planet Search". Tell me if you think it has any interest or is just weird

http://bustard.phys.nd.edu/MPS/
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's not wierd, but the detection rate would be pretty low, even if there were lots and lots of planets. Planets orbit in a plane, so the path of lensing object (as seen by us) would need to be in (or sufficiently close to) the orbital plane.

IIRC, there was quite a lot of excitement over the light curve of a caustic crossing lens event, some saw it as evidence of a planet.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top