Microscope field of view & depth of field/focus (confocal microscopy)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the challenges faced during a FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching) experiment using a confocal microscopy setup. The user, Aleks, successfully bleaches a spot in thin specimens (<1 micron) but encounters difficulties with larger specimens (>100 microns) due to the illumination beam causing fluorescence above and below the bleach spot. Aleks theorizes that the depth of focus, calculated at approximately 10 microns, may be affecting visibility. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between focal point and field of view in microscopy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching) techniques
  • Knowledge of confocal microscopy principles
  • Familiarity with depth of focus and depth of view concepts
  • Experience with optical systems and beam collimation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between depth of focus and depth of view in microscopy
  • Explore confocal microscopy setups for enhanced FRAP experiments
  • Study the effects of specimen thickness on fluorescence and bleaching visibility
  • Investigate advanced techniques for optimizing FRAP results in larger specimens
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and technicians involved in microscopy, particularly those conducting FRAP experiments, as well as anyone seeking to enhance their understanding of confocal microscopy and optical imaging techniques.

ponjavic
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to run a FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching) experiment but I am struggling a little bit. For those not exposed to the technique it involves, for example, bleaching a spot in a specimen that is fluorescing rendering that spot dark in contrast.

I have two separate beams going through my microscope which I suppose can be considered as a lens.

One beam is collimated and almost fills the lens. The other beam is diverging as to illuminate the surroundings to contrast with the dark central spot.

The reason why I'm even posing a question is that using a very thin specimen (<1 micron) I have no problems bleaching and identifying the spot. Once I have something larger (<100 microns) I am unable to do it.

This is my theory but I would like to back it up:

The bleach spot is obviously smaller than the depth of my channel. The illumination beam causes the dye to fluoresce above and below the bleach spot not allowing me to observe it. The solution to this would be using a confocal setup.

I've calculated the depth of focus to be approximately 10microns but I don't know if this is the depth of focus of what I can see (probably is) or if it's the depth of focus of what I am bleaching or if these are the same (should be I suppose but then I shouldn't be having problems).

Any input or if you want me to clarify something is welcome.

Aleks

Edit:
I also don't understand why a collimated laser beam when focused on a surface only covers about 5% of the field of view (as shown in the diagram the bleach spot is much smaller than the field of view).

Edit2:
Ok I just realized that focal point != field of view. The field of view will depend on where the binoculars are in relation to the objective. As my field of view is much larger than my focal point, so should my depth of view be much larger than the depth of focus (excuse the terminology) and thus the bleach spot will not be seen.
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    23.1 KB · Views: 782
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Andy Resnick said:
Nikon's 'microscopyU' page is excellent- here's a few pages to get you started:

http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/formulas/formulasfielddepth.html

http://www.microscopyu.com/references/frap.html
Thanks Andy, I've read all of it though.

I have yet to read about a comparison between depth of view and bleach depth. I find it very strange to read about FRAP without and with a confocal setup. The only way I could see the non confocal approach working would be with a very thin specimen.

I am just trying to visualize the hourglass the microscope allows me to see in comparison to the hourglass produced by my bleaching beam.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K