Explain Different Types of Light Microscopy

In summary: But you can't take this intuition too far. It's not that light is a wave in a sea of ether, it is just that light obeys a wave equation that is very similar to the wave equation that describes waves in the sea.
  • #1
patrickbotros
34
1
Okay so first I would like someone to add detail to my descriptions of different types of light microscopy. Here's what I know:
Brightfield (unstained): standard view of partially opaque, live cells.
Brightfield (stained): standard view of colored, dead cells.
Phase Contrast: Not sure how it works but it gives a view of a stained, live cell.
Differential Interference Contrast/Nomarski: Not sure how this works but it gives 3D view of live cells.
Fluorescence: Uses proteins that on one end bind to specific organelles and on the other end glow under certain radiation light
Deconvolution: Not really sure but is colored
Confocal: Basically fluorescence only using a computer to only look at light from different depths so no out of focus light is included. Good for dead, stained cells.
Superresolution: Uses different fluorescent molecules that light up under different types of light and then combines all the images.
If I'm wrong about any of this please let me know.
Also why are electron microscopes so much more accurate than light microscopes?
Thanks :D
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
patrickbotros said:
Also why are electron microscopes so much more accurate than light microscopes?

Light travels in straight lines. But can light bend around the corner? Yes, if it's wavelength is long enough. Bending around the corner will make images fuzzy.

Electrons have shorter wave lengths, so they bend less and cast sharper shadows, so resolution is better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/raylei.html (this is a rule of thumb - one can do better if one has additional information - this is the basis of some forms of super-resolution http://advanced-microscopy.utah.edu/education/super-res/)
 
  • #3
atyy said:
Light travels in straight lines. But can light bend around the corner? Yes, if it's wavelength is long enough. Bending around the corner will make images fuzzy.

Electrons have shorter wave lengths, so they bend less and cast sharper shadows, so resolution is better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/raylei.html (this is a rule of thumb - one can do better if one has additional information - this is the basis of some forms of super-resolution http://advanced-microscopy.utah.edu/education/super-res/)
Wait what? Why does wavelength affect scattering/bending? Is this just a fact or is there an intuition behind it?
 
  • #4
patrickbotros said:
Okay so first I would like someone to add detail to my descriptions of different types of light microscopy. Here's what I know:
Brightfield (unstained): standard view of partially opaque, live cells.
Brightfield (stained): standard view of colored, dead cells.

Yeesh.. you have a long list. So far, so good... basically- I assume you mean 'stain' like an H&E stain (as opposed to fluorescent stains...) And many of the techniques here can be done either with transillumination or epi-illumination.

patrickbotros said:
Phase Contrast: Not sure how it works but it gives a view of a stained, live cell.

No- phase contrast is generally used on unstained cells. Contrast is generated by interfering scattered and unscattered light; phase objectives often have a mostly-opaque soot ring with a diameter matched to the condenser phase mask- this is called 'matched filters'.

patrickbotros said:
Differential Interference Contrast/Nomarski: Not sure how this works but it gives 3D view of live cells.

No, it only appears 3-D. If contrast in phase contrast imaging is due to (spatial) differences in the refractive index, DIC creates contrast according to the spatial gradient of the refractive index. And it is possible to color-code the images with a spectacularly poor quarter-wave plate called a 'deSenarmont compensator'. Another term for DIC is 'wavefront shear interferometry', and these are variations of DIC including Hoffman modulation.

patrickbotros said:
Fluorescence: Uses proteins that on one end bind to specific organelles and on the other end glow under certain radiation light

Sure, basically- there are primary and secondary antibodies involved, and the idea is to image where specific proteins are located.

patrickbotros said:
Deconvolution: Not really sure but is colored

Deconvolution is conceptually like division. If the image is the object convolved with the point spread function, deconvolution attempts to reconstruct the original object. It's not a trivial computational exercise.

patrickbotros said:
Confocal: Basically fluorescence only using a computer to only look at light from different depths so no out of focus light is included. Good for dead, stained cells.

Close enough- an illumination point is imaged onto the sample, and so is 'confocal' to the object. Depth sectioning is the main rationale for using a confocal system.

patrickbotros said:
Superresolution: Uses different fluorescent molecules that light up under different types of light and then combines all the images.

No- superresolution is a constellation of imaging techniques that usually combine many images to produce a single image with resolution in excess of the diffraction limit. There are many techniques, my favorite is STORM, but to each their own.

patrickbotros said:
If I'm wrong about any of this please let me know.
Also why are electron microscopes so much more accurate than light microscopes?
Thanks :D[/QUOTE]

I don't know about 'accurate', but the lateral resolution of an electron microscope is in excess of a light microscope, since the wavelength of the electrons is less than that of visible light. I don't know about longitudinal resolution; electron microscopes usually have a lot of spherical aberration.

You forgot about darkfield, oblique imaging, two-photon, conoscopic observation, Rheinberg illumination (a personal favorite), dispersion staining,...

Get thee to https://www.microscopyu.com/, post-haste.
 
  • #5
patrickbotros said:
Wait what? Why does wavelength affect scattering/bending? Is this just a fact or is there an intuition behind it?

It is just a fact that is described mathematically by the wave equation. This phenomenon is called diffraction.

But there is an intuition to it (it's a bit better for sound waves, and for light waves this is quite misleading, so discard this if you don't like it, better to learn the equations). If light were fundamentally a ray, then it makes sense that it would travel in straight lines. But if you think light is a wave, then it makes sense that it would not travel in straight lines. After all, if you put an obstacle in the path of waves in the sea, the waves can go around the obstacle. The bigger the obstacle, the less the waves can go around it. On the other hand, the bigger the wavelength, the smaller the obstacle is relative to the wave, so this gives some intuition as to why wavelength affects bending around an obstacle.

Actually, I don't know if this answer is misleading, so I will post your question in general physics, and see what answers we get.

Edit: Here is the thread I started in general physics with your question: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-does-wavelength-affect-diffraction.834361/#post-5238693.
 

Related to Explain Different Types of Light Microscopy

1. What is light microscopy?

Light microscopy is a scientific technique that uses visible light to magnify and study objects that are too small to be seen with the naked eye. It involves passing light through a sample and using lenses to magnify and focus the image.

2. What are the different types of light microscopy?

There are several types of light microscopy, including brightfield, darkfield, phase contrast, fluorescence, and confocal microscopy. Each type uses different techniques and equipment to produce images with different contrast and resolution.

3. How does brightfield microscopy work?

Brightfield microscopy is the most common type of light microscopy. It works by passing white light through a sample and using lenses to magnify the image. The sample appears bright against a dark background, making it suitable for observing stained or naturally pigmented samples.

4. What is the difference between fluorescence and confocal microscopy?

Fluorescence microscopy uses fluorescent dyes or proteins to label specific structures or molecules in a sample, making them visible under specific wavelengths of light. Confocal microscopy, on the other hand, uses a laser to scan a sample and create a 3D image by focusing on a specific plane of the sample at a time. This allows for higher resolution and better depth perception compared to traditional fluorescence microscopy.

5. What are the advantages of using light microscopy?

Light microscopy has several advantages, including its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to observe living samples in real-time. It also allows for a wide range of sample preparation techniques, making it suitable for a variety of samples. Additionally, advances in technology have led to the development of more sophisticated light microscopes with increased resolution and capabilities.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
789
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top