Microwave energy problem (please check my answers)

  • Thread starter Thread starter madeeeeee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Microwave
AI Thread Summary
A 1000W microwave oven heats 500 g of water from 10.0°C to 55.0°C in 2 minutes, resulting in a thermal energy gain of 94,500 J. The power associated with this thermal energy is calculated to be 787.5 W, indicating that approximately 79% of the microwave's electricity power is used for heating the water. Energy losses occur due to the microwave's operation, heating the air, and the cup, with most losses attributed to waste heat vented from the appliance. The calculations presented appear to be correct, confirming the efficiency and energy transfer involved in the process. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding energy conversion and losses in microwave heating.
madeeeeee
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Power microwave problem?
A 1000W microwave oven heats 500 g of water from 10.0 degrees Celsius to 55.0 degrees C in a time of 2 min. the heat capacity of water is 4200 J/kgdegrees C



Homework Equations


have i done this properly? there are 4 other questions with this


The Attempt at a Solution



P=1000W
m=0.5kg
T1=10.0C
T2=55.0C
change in T=45C
t=120s
c=4200J/kg degress C

a) how much thermal energy did the water gain?

have i done this correctly

Q=mcT
=(.5kg)(4200 J/kgC)(45C)
=94500 J
Q=9.5 x 10^4 J

b)How much power was associated with this thermal energy?

have i done this correctly

P=E/t
=9.5x10^4 J / (120s)
P=787.5 W

c) What percentage of the electricity power that went into the microwave actually went into heating the water?

Did i do this correctly

787.5 W / 1000 W x 100
= 79%

d) Why didn't all the electricity energy of the microwave get converted to thermal energy of the water?

Because loss of energy was also due to opperating the microwave and making cup of water spin

What are other reasons?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It all looks about right to me. There's a bit of energy going into the heating the air and the cup, but I that would be small. The spinning of the cup would be even smaller. Mostly losses of some kind in the microwave operation sounds about right to me. A microwave oven usually has vents around the back to help get rid of waste heat, which would be most of the losses.

Cheers -- sylas
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top