Microwaves through an ice sphere: Which scattering solution is best?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a high school project involving the transmission of microwaves through an ice sphere, exploring the complexities of scattering. The researcher seeks clarity on whether to apply Rayleigh or Mie scattering theories, given the ice's absorption of electromagnetic waves. There is confusion regarding the relevance of inelastic scattering processes in this context. The researcher anticipates that the significant absorption by ice will play a crucial role in their findings. Ultimately, the inquiry aims to determine the most appropriate theoretical framework for predicting scattering behavior in this experiment.
DarkLightA
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I apologize for not following the template, but it doesn't really fit. I would have posted it elsewhere but as it's for academic purposes I think it has to be here. Please excuse me if I'm wrong.

I'm a high schooler working on a project, and I was planning to send ≈3 cm microwaves through an ice sphere with diameter varying from about 1-6 cm and see the change in scattering.

Unfortunately, through the research I've done it seems like this is way more complicated than I'd imagined.

So, I need some help.

Wikipedia (Most reliable source... Well...) states:
Major forms of elastic light scattering (involving negligible energy transfer) are Rayleigh scattering and Mie scattering. Inelastic scattering includes Brillouin scattering, Raman scattering, inelastic X-ray scattering and Compton scattering.

And this confuses me. I know ice absorbs some EM waves, and thus it must be somewhat inelastic. However, I'm not sure whether that's what is meant.

Can someone help me with which I should use, and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The wavelength is so long, effects from the whole material should be more relevant than those inelastic scattering processes. I would expect significant absorption.

I think classical physics was the right subforum ;).
 


Huh, okay. Does this mean I can use something like the Mie Theory to predict scattering, or not?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top