Mid-latitude Mar's ancient covalent bonded ice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the properties of ancient Martian ice, questioning whether it might be covalently bonded and denser than Earth ice due to its age. It suggests that drilling into Martian ice could allow for measurements of voltage and amperage as proxies for density differences. The feasibility of bringing back a cube of Mars ice without melting is also considered, along with its potential behavior in water. Additionally, the conversation touches on the idea of using a Mars orbital telescope to achieve high-resolution geological observations, particularly regarding Martian ice and its characteristics. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the scientific inquiry into the nature of Martian ice and its implications for understanding the planet's geology.
cph
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Might ancient mid-latitude Mar's ice be covalently bonded? Would 1-2 billion year old ice have much greater density then, compared to Earth ice? So drilling into Mars' ice, compared to drilling into Earth ice, and measure relative difference in voltage/ampere as a proxy for relative density. Could one bring back a cube of Mars ice, without melting? Also wouldn't such guessed at Mars ice sink in water? Would it super cool your drink?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
No, because there's no stable covalent bond to be formed. The HOMO of water is anti-bonding.

Depending on pressure and temperature conditions, you can have different forms of ice; we already know of at least a dozen different phases of ice.
But I don't think that we're going to find anything new or unique in martian ice, because the conditions on Mars aren't very exotic compared to what can be achived in the lab.
 
Whoops, wrote HOMO, meant LUMO.
 
cph said:
Might ancient mid-latitude Mar's ice be covalently bonded? Would 1-2 billion year old ice have much greater density then, compared to Earth ice? So drilling into Mars' ice, compared to drilling into Earth ice, and measure relative difference in voltage/ampere as a proxy for relative density. Could one bring back a cube of Mars ice, without melting? Also wouldn't such guessed at Mars rock ice sink in water? Would it super cool your drink?

Re: Mars' orbital telescope and ice rock
Originally Posted by cph View Post

Might one place a telescope in Mars orbit, in order to obtain 2 mm resolution, looking for closeup geological views; such as mars' stromatolytic fossils, or mars' ice (rock) on the surface, in form of a smooth surface that seems a bit odd? Might billions year old Mars' ice be opaque to light, and take on the appearance of rock, but very light weight rock? So is there mars' ice rock on the surface? Do any of the Mars meteroites on Earth have in part Mars rock ice?

As noted 2 mm resolution (that of a field geologist) would be better. Also placing a Moon orbiter (rover-like) with a telescope, looking for Moon rock ice etc. For example, what appears to be a rock effacement, might continue into mottled appearance for near to reflected light. Thus a geological data base at 2mm resolution also for the Moon; equivalent to placing a geologist on the Moon.
 
2 mm at 200 km, that means sin(θ)=10-8. Using Rayleigh criterion

\sin \theta = 1.220 \frac {\lambda}{D}

and assuming visible light at 500 nm, you need lens with 61 meter diameter. Good luck.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top