Might inflationary multiverses bumping cause anisotropy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrZforLife
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea that collisions between inflationary universes could cause anisotropy in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) and influence galaxy formation. While some believe such interactions could leave measurable signatures in the CMB, skepticism exists regarding the nature and impact of these collisions. It is suggested that if two universes were to collide, they would create distinct patterns, but current observations have not confirmed this. Additionally, the timeline of inflation indicates that these interactions would not directly lead to galaxy formation, as the universe's conditions would be too stable by that time. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, empirical evidence remains lacking.
DrZforLife
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Could two Inflationary universes bumping up against one another result in the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation and thus ultimately lead to galaxy formation? And could the signature for such an event be measured?
It seems two "big bang" universes arising near one another might gently interact before the space between them expands fast enough to separate them. Could this, hopefully gentle, interaction be responsible for the eventual aggregation of matter into stars? If so, such a local interaction like two balloons bumping should leave some measurable "fingerprint" in both.

Eagerly awaiting enlightenment,

DrZ
 
Space news on Phys.org
From a totally speculative premise, you can make any conclusion that you like. No one can prove you wrong.
 
Would not such an encounter leave a trace that would fit with a mathematical model consistent with cosmological models? And could such an interaction not be seen in the CMBR? New observations are so sensitive it seems any predicted ripples or perterbations might be seen.
 
DrZforLife said:
Would not such an encounter leave a trace that would fit with a mathematical model consistent with cosmological models? And could such an interaction not be seen in the CMBR? New observations are so sensitive it seems any predicted ripples or perterbations might be seen.

A guy named Matthew Johnson from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics recently came to give a talk about this in my department. The short answer seems to be, "yes, people think that bubble collisions would leave observational signatures in the CMB." Some searching revealed that this was probably the paper he made reference to in his talk:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1995

and also this, its companion:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3667

For the sake of clarity, he's talking about eternal inflation, a scenario in which our observable universe is a sort of non-inflating "pocket universe" or "bubble" that has separated out of an eternally inflating background, and the theory predicts that many such bubbles or "pocket universes" would exist, each perhaps with different physical constants of nature.

phinds said:
From a totally speculative premise, you can make any conclusion that you like. No one can prove you wrong.

Skepticism is always good, but it turns out the OP was not totally out to lunch here. :wink:
 
Last edited:
DrZforLife said:
Could two Inflationary universes bumping up against one another result in the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation

Two inflationary universes bumping against either other would result in anisotropy, but not the anisotropy we see. If you have only two universes, then you'd see massive directional differences which is something we *don't* see.

Thus ultimately lead to galaxy formation?

Nope. Inflation happens a millions of years before galaxy formation. By the time galaxies form, then the universe has settled down. Now you could see a signature in the distribution of galaxies, but this would be some large directional component that we don't see.

Also galaxy formation is a huge unknown, but by the time it happens, the universe is cool enough so that there is little room for "weird physics."

And could the signature for such an event be measured?

Yes it could. We haven't seen it so, there are limits on what can happen.

It seems two "big bang" universes arising near one another might gently interact before the space between them expands fast enough to separate them.

Two universe colliding wouldn't be gentle.

Could this, hopefully gentle, interaction be responsible for the eventual aggregation of matter into stars?

No it couldn't. When stars form, we are in "non-weird" physics at which point, we can rule out weird things happening like colliding universes. (Also, colliding *galaxies* are important in star formation).

If so, such a local interaction like two balloons bumping should leave some measurable "fingerprint" in both.

Yes. And we don't see it (people have looked).

Also you mention two balloons. If you have a large number of balloons things are different...
 
DrZforLife said:
Could two Inflationary universes bumping up against one another result in the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation and thus ultimately lead to galaxy formation? And could the signature for such an event be measured?
It seems two "big bang" universes arising near one another might gently interact before the space between them expands fast enough to separate them. Could this, hopefully gentle, interaction be responsible for the eventual aggregation of matter into stars? If so, such a local interaction like two balloons bumping should leave some measurable "fingerprint" in both.

Eagerly awaiting enlightenment,

DrZ
The interaction isn't quite so gentle, but yes, it would leave a distinct signature on the CMB if it happened late enough in inflation. Basically, such collisions produce ring-like patterns on the CMB. Some statistical tests of WMAP data show that maybe there is such a pattern, but the detection isn't strong enough to say for sure:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3667

Edit: Oh, and by the way, it is certainly the case that most of the fluctuations we see on the CMB are not due to any sort of collision.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top