MIL-STD-750-3 Transistor Testing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on testing transistors according to MIL-STD-750-3, which primarily illustrates test circuits for PNP transistors. Users are clarifying that for NPN transistors, it is acceptable to reverse the polarity of the voltage and bias sources while keeping the emitter, collector, and base configurations the same. There is no separate standard for NPN transistors; the existing methods can be adapted as needed. Participants emphasize the importance of accuracy and suggest posting specific circuit configurations for verification. Overall, reversing the polarity is deemed a valid approach for testing NPN devices under this standard.
MitYeltu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I just want to check my sanity...

I am going to be testing some transistors in a lab very soon per the above mil std. The test methods range from Vce, Vbe, hfe and the breakdown voltages that are listed on the datasheet. The transistor at this point is irrelevant.

Here's what I need to understand. According to the mil std, the circuits are all drawn for PNP trnsistors in one configuration. That's fine. However, I will most,likely be testing NPN transistors. So, if I understand this right, all I need to do is reverse the polarity of the sources and test equipment (ammeter, voltmeter) in order to correctly perform the tests per this std. Is this right?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
MitYeltu said:
I just want to check my sanity...

I am going to be testing some transistors in a lab very soon per the above mil std. The test methods range from Vce, Vbe, hfe and the breakdown voltages that are listed on the datasheet. The transistor at this point is irrelevant.

Here's what I need to understand. According to the mil std, the circuits are all drawn for PNP trnsistors in one configuration. That's fine. However, I will most,likely be testing NPN transistors. So, if I understand this right, all I need to do is reverse the polarity of the sources and test equipment (ammeter, voltmeter) in order to correctly perform the tests per this std. Is this right?
Is there a different standard for testing NPN transistors? It seems strange that the standard would leave it up to the tester's imagination to come up with the complementary test circuit setups. It's not that hard, but it could be error-prone.
 
No, there is not a different methods for NPN. That's why I'm asking. I suspect it is merely a matter of reversing things - keep the emitter, collector and base where they are in the circuits, but simply reverse the polarity on the sources. However, as I said, I'm not positive on this and I really don't like burning the UUTs.
 
I just found out that the standard is available for free download (I'd assumed it was copyrighted and needed to be purchased). Here is one source:

https://snebulos.mit.edu/projects/reference/MIL-STD/MIL-STD-750-3.pdf

And they mention that the PNP circuits are the only ones shown, and others will be used for NPN transistors:
4.2 Test circuits.
The test circuits shown in the test methods of this test method standard are given as examples which may be used for the measurements. They are not necessarily the only test circuits which can be used; however the manufacturer shall demonstrate to the Government that other test circuits which they may desire to use will give results within the desired accuracy of measurement. Circuits are shown for PNP transistors in one circuit configuration only. They may readily be adapted for NPN devices and for other circuit configurations.
And in the Notes for Figure 3011-1, they do say to reverse the sources for NPN transistors:
NOTES:
1. A PNP device is shown. For NPN types, reverse the polarities of the voltage and bias sources and zener diode
I think in general reversing the polarity of the sources should work for most testing of PNP/NPN transistors, but if you have a question about a particular circuit that you want to verify, go ahead and post the two versions here in this thread so we can double-check them. :smile:
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top