Minimum Angle for Increasing Distance of Projectile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hashiramasenju
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum angle to the vertical for a projectile to be released with a certain speed, ensuring that the distance to the projectile is always increasing. The subject area includes kinematics and projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using Pythagorean theorem to analyze the distance to the projectile and the conditions under which this distance increases. There are mentions of exploring alternative methods, such as using trig substitutions, graphing software, and pattern recognition.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the need for the derivative of the distance to be positive during the projectile's flight. Various angles have been suggested as potential answers, but there is no explicit consensus on a single correct angle. The conversation reflects ongoing exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the correct angle, with multiple values being proposed. Participants are also questioning the assumptions made in their approaches and the complexity of the algebra involved.

Hashiramasenju
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



whats the minimum angles to the vertical(theta) for a projectile(ball) to be realeased with speed v such that at any point of time the distance to the ball is increasing.

Homework Equations



Sh=vtsin(theta)
Sv=vtcos(theta)-0.5gt^2

The Attempt at a Solution


so i used pythagoras theorum to find the square of the distance to the projectile(R). thus d(R^2)/dt>0 because the distance to the ball from the origin(start point) must be increasing. But the algebra gets really nasty. Is there any alternative way or is there any error in my method
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's pretty much it. You probably need a table of trig substitutions.
Don't forget you only need dR/dt > 0 for 0 < t < T (time of flight)... in fact, if R decreases at all, which part of the trajectory will that happen?

There are other methods... ie you can guess some values and look for a pattern, you can try using your understanding of parabolas to narrow your choice, use graphing software... etc.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
No, that's pretty much it. You probably need a table of trig substitutions.
Don't forget you only need dR/dt > 0 for 0 < t < T (time of flight)... in fact, if R decreases at all, which part of the trajectory will that happen?

There are other methods... ie you can guess some values and look for a pattern, you can try using your understanding of parabolas to narrow your choice, use graphing software... etc.
Btw is the answer 45 deg
 
Simon Bridge said:
No, that's pretty much it. You probably need a table of trig substitutions.
Don't forget you only need dR/dt > 0 for 0 < t < T (time of flight)... in fact, if R decreases at all, which part of the trajectory will that happen?

There are other methods... ie you can guess some values and look for a pattern, you can try using your understanding of parabolas to narrow your choice, use graphing software... etc.
So is the answer 45 deg and 35.26
 
The question only requires one number for the answer.
I don't know the correct answer off the top of my head.
 
Hashiramasenju said:
So is the answer 45 deg and 35.26
I get something a bit less than 20° .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: azizlwl
SammyS said:
I get something a bit less than 20° .
How did you get that ?
 
Hashiramasenju said:
How did you get that ?
I did what you set up as follows.
Hashiramasenju said:

The Attempt at a Solution


so i used pythagoras theorum to find the square of the distance to the projectile(R). thus d(R^2)/dt>0 because the distance to the ball from the origin(start point) must be increasing. But the algebra gets really nasty. Is there any alternative way or is there any error in my method
Thanks
R2 = Sh2 + Sv2 is not as difficult to deal with as it might at first appear to be. R2 is a degree 4 polynomial in t, but the constant term and the linear term are bot zero. Its derivative is a cubic polynomial in t, with a constant term of 0, so that one of the zeros is t=0, and you can use the quadratic formula for the other two zeros.

All that is needed is that the derivative is never zero, except perhaps at t = 0. Simply check the discriminant to determine those conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K