Minimum conditions for defining joint PDF

winterfors
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Suppose one knows a probability density p(x) over a space X (where x\in X) and a conditional probability density p(y|x) over a space Y (where y\in Y).

This implies the integral \int{p(x)dx} is well defined as well as \int{p(y|x)dy}.

Defining a joint probability density

p(x,y)\ =\ p(y|x)p(x) ,​

p(x) will clearly be its marginal density over X, and the double integral

P(C)\ = \ \iint\limits_{(x,y)\in C}{p(x,y)dydx}​

is well defined for all measurable subsets C\ \subseteq \ X\times Y.One commonly assumes that integrals with reversed order of integration are equivalent

P(C)\ = \ \iint\limits_{(x,y)\in C}{p(x,y)dxdy}\qquad ,​

which also implies that the marginal probability density over Y exists and is uniquely defined p(y)\ = \ \int{p(x,y)dx}.This is not necessarily the case, since the change in order of integration poses restrictions on the integrand p(x,y). One sufficient condition, I believe, is that p(x,y) is continuous, but that is clearly not the minimal condition required. For instance, change of order of integration can be done for a p(x,y) that involves step functions, which are obviously not continuous.

Does anyone know what the minimal conditions are for changing the order of integration, in this case?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If p>=0 then you just need to know that p is measurable. More generally, if p is measurable then
<br /> \int\int |p(x,y)|dxdy=\int\int |p(x,y)| dydx<br />
and, as long as this is finite then you can commute the integrals in \int\int p(x,y)dxdy. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fubini%27s_theorem" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top