Minimum distance from a repulsive central force

AI Thread Summary
A particle of mass m is influenced by a repulsive central force described by Fr=Cr^-3, where C is a positive constant. The problem involves determining the minimum distance, rmin, from the center of the force using conservation of energy and angular momentum principles. The total energy at a large distance is K, and the potential energy is suggested to be V(r) = -3C/r^2. The discussion reveals confusion regarding the correct form of V(r) and the application of angular momentum in the calculations. Ultimately, integrating the force from rmin to infinity is proposed as a method to find the solution, though it diverges from using angular momentum directly.
gcfve
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m moves under action of a repulsive central force Fr=Cr-3 with constant C greater than 0. At a very large distance from the centre of the force, the partcle has kinetic energy K and its impact parameter is b. Use conservation of energy and angular momentum to show that the closest m comes to the centre of force is rmin=\sqrt{b^2+ C/2K}


Homework Equations


L=mbv0
E=\frac{1}{2}mvr2+L2/2mr2+V(r)



The Attempt at a Solution


So far, I said that since the object is far away its total energy is K
I think V(r) = -3C/r2, but I'm not sure.
And at rmin, E==\frac{1}{2}mvrmin2+(mbv)2/2mr2-3C/rmin2

I don't know what to do next.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PHY2333...Assignment is due tomorrow... Still can't get this either. Where do you get -3C/r^2 for V(r)? Would it not be -0.5C/r^2?
 
Yeah, I still don't know how to get it.
 
oops wrong topic
 
Last edited:
Take Force integrate from rmin to b, as when r is infinity, it will approximately equal to be, because it is essentially uneffected by the force anyway. this integration will give you the answer. I know its not using angular momentum, but I don't care at this point.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top