Minimum radius to avoid voltage breakdown?

AI Thread Summary
The minimum radius to avoid voltage breakdown is influenced by the voltage, distance between the electrodes, and the gas properties in the gap. The electric field strength near a conductor is inversely related to the radius of curvature, meaning a smaller radius increases the electric field and the risk of arcing. To determine the minimum radius, one can refer to Paschen's law, which relates these variables. It is important to note that the radius of curvature is often assumed to be effectively infinite in calculations, as its impact is typically negligible compared to the separation distance. Understanding these relationships is crucial for preventing voltage breakdown in electrical systems.
rwiebe89
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out the minimum radius needed to avoid voltage breakdown. I found this from a Physics website:

"The electric field near a conductor is inversely proportional to the radius of curvature of the surface."

So if I know the voltage and the distance between the 2 metal surfaces (a cylinder and rod), how would I calculate the minimum radius needed on the cylinder to keep from arcing between the cylinder and rod? Am I going about this wrong? Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess I should have specified. I'm looking for at the difference a radius has on a voltage breakdown. Right now I have a square edge, but needed know the minimum radius needed to avoid a breakdown.
 
rwiebe89 said:
I guess I should have specified. I'm looking for at the difference a radius has on a voltage breakdown. Right now I have a square edge, but needed know the minimum radius needed to avoid a breakdown.

The minimum radius will depend on the voltage, the separation and the pressure and chemical identity of the gas in between your two electrodes. That is why I pointed you towards the Paschen curve data. If you know 3 of the 4 quantities above, then you can calculate the 4th. The radius of curvature is not generally one of the input quantities .. I *think* this is because it is generally assumed to be effectively infinite (i.e. the ratio of the radius to the separation between electrodes is large enough that the field inhomogeneity induced by the curvature is negligible.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top