Minimum speed of the bullet to penetrate a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum speed required for a bullet to penetrate a uniformly charged sphere. The bullet, with mass m and charge q, must reach the center of the sphere to overcome the outward electric field. Two methods are proposed: conservation of energy and the work-energy theorem, both of which seem valid. However, a sign issue in the work-energy equation is noted, indicating a need for correction. The conversation also briefly touches on another related thread about flux through a circular ring.
Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



A bullet of mass m and charge q is fired towards a solid uniformly charged sphere of radius R and total charge + q. If it strikes the surface of sphere with speed u, find the minimum speed u so that it can penetrate through the sphere. (Neglect all resistance forces or friction acting on bullet except electrostatic forces)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I think if the bullet can just reach the center ,then it can penetrate through the sphere because the electric field inside a sphere is radially outwards .As it reaches the center and moves just a little bit outwards radially ,the electric field will push the bullet outwards .

The problem can be approached either by conservation of energy or by work kinetic energy theorem.

1) By conservation of energy

kq2/R+(1/2)mu2 = (3/2)kq2/R

2) By work energy theorem

## \int_{R}^{0}\frac{kq^{2}r}{R^3} \hat{r} \cdot dr\hat{r} = \frac{1}{2}mu^2 ##

Have I approached the problem correctly or is there something more in it ?
 
  • Like
Likes Subhajit Das
Physics news on Phys.org
Both approaches look correct to me.

But in the work energy equation, there might be a sign problem. I think your integral on the left is correct for the work done by the electric force on the bullet as it goes from the surface to the center. But, is the sign correct on the right for the change in KE?
 
Yes.. you are right.There should be a minus sign in the LHS .

Thanks TSny...

Would you mind having a look at the other thread :"flux through a circular ring " .
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Yes.. you are right.There should be a minus sign in the LHS .

Thanks TSny...

Would you mind having a look at the other thread :"flux through a circular ring " .

I'll take a look tomorrow. It's that time again. :zzz:
 
Okay :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top