Minimun lens size (in meters) that will permit just resolving 2 stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum lens size required to resolve two stars that are 1.1 arcseconds apart using light of 510 nm wavelength. The resolution condition states that the maximum of one image must coincide with the minimum of the other, leading to the formula involving the slit width and angle. Participants clarify that for small angles, sine and tangent can be approximated by the angle in radians. The angle of 1.1 arcseconds is converted to radians for calculations. The conversation emphasizes using the provided values to solve for the slit width effectively.
cheez
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
What is the minimun lens size (in meters) that will permit just resolving 2 stars 1.1 seconds apart using light of 510 nm?
For a slit of width a, light of wavelength L, the first minimun occurs at an angle t from the center, assume a slit shaped lens! E=E max L* sin(pi a sin(t)/L)/(pi a sin(t) )
Hint: you don't really need all of this. Resolution implies that the maximun of one image falls on the minimun of the other.
I have really no clue on how to this:cry: please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cheez said:
I have really no clue on how to this:cry: please help!
The first minimum occurs when a sin (\theta) = \lambda.



In these problems, often the angles are so small that you may replace sin and tan by the angle itself at the condition of working in radians.

Then a \theta \approx \lambda.

They give you lambda and theta. Just convert theta in radians and solve for "a" which will be the slit width "a"
 
how to calculate theta? thanks you so much!
 
cheez said:
how to calculate theta? thanks you so much!
If one is given the distance between the sources of light (perpendicular to the line of sight) and the distance between the sources and the lens, there is a formula in terms of a tangent. But here you are in luck, they give you the value of theta in the problem!
They are 1.1 arcsecond apart (if they said second, they really meant arcsecond). Do you know what an arc second is? It is one degree divided by 3600 (this comes from the fact that one degree is 60 arcminutes and one arcminute is 60 arcsenonds). So your angle is 1.1/3600 degrees. Now convert that in radians, plug that in the equation and you are done.

Patrick
 
thx for your answer!
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

How far apart are two stars resolved by a 68-cm telescope?
Replies
3
Views
8K
Stargazing What are the limitations of astrophotography and how can they be overcome?
Replies
34
Views
13K
Strange Spam Email (The Limitation of the Photon Hypothesis)
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top