Misc Questions: Virtual work, RMS, Friction on incline, and Virtual Displacement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion covers several topics related to physics concepts. It clarifies that "virtual work" has two distinct meanings, one in introductory physics and another in calculus of variations, and distinguishes it from "pseudo work." The root mean square is preferred in kinetic theory for its ability to handle negative velocities effectively, although other statistical methods could also be used. For a cylinder rolling up an incline, the friction force acts up the incline to counteract the gravitational force and provide necessary torque. Lastly, the conversation seeks an example of a problem involving an impossible virtual displacement.
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
I have a few questions I thought I'd post together instead of making separate threads, hope that's ok. They are more or less unrelated...

1. Are there 2 conceptual ideas that use the term "virtual work"? I am familiar with the one from intro level physics, but I read there is also one from calculus of variations and could not tell if it was really the same thing or not (due to hardcore ignorance of calculus of variations). Also "virtual work" is totally unrelated to "pseudo work" (internal energy), right?

2. Why is the root mean square used in kinetic theory as opposed to other averaging methods? I understand it accounts for negative velocities but can't other statistical methods do that as well? Was it that this just happened to be chosen by Maxwell?

3. What is the direction of the force of friction for a cylinder rolling up an incline? I know its up the incline for when its rolling down...need help with a better way to think about this. I know that the net acceleration must be down for the object to decelerate as it travels up the incline, but not sure if friction is adding to the force due to gravity or subtracting. I feel stupid for not getting this.

4. Can someone give an example of a problem which requires the solver to use an impossible virtual displacement?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mishima said:
3. What is the direction of the force of friction for a cylinder rolling up an incline? I know its up the incline for when its rolling down.
The friction force is related to acceleration, not velocity, so it doesn't matter if the initial state has the cylinder rolling up or down the incline, the friction force is up the incline (due to the angular inertia of the cylinder "resisting" the downwards acceleration of gravity).
 
3.
to find out direction of friction force,,,, just assume the surfaces smooth,,,,then find out direction of relative motion between the two surfaces,,,,the friction will always try to stop this relative motion,,,,
in ur case when the cylinder is rolling up,,,frictional force (acting upward) will provide necessary torque to retard(angular velocity)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top