MHB Mixture problem 2 - linear equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the percentage of silica in clay and carbon in coal based on their moisture content. For the clay, it is clarified that after drying, the percentage of silica on a dry basis is 50%, not 100%, since other substances remain after water evaporates. In the case of coal, the percentage of carbon on a wet basis is determined by calculating the mass of carbon from the dry matter and dividing it by the original mass of the coal. The calculations show that after drying, the total mass of the clay is 90 kg, making silica 50% of that total. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the impact of moisture on weight percentages in mixtures.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
1. A clay contains 45% silica and 10% water. Determine the percentage of silica in the clay on a dry (water-free) basis. All percentages are by weight.

my answer is 100% silica. because if the clay is water free the clay is 100% silica. is this correct?

2. A coal contains 2.4% water. After drying, the moisture-free residue contains 71.0% carbon.
Determine the percentage of carbon on the “wet basis.” All percentages are by weight.

for this I have no idea. please give me some assistance here. thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
1. A clay contains 45% silica and 10% water. Determine the percentage of silica in the clay on a dry (water-free) basis. All percentages are by weight.

my answer is 100% silica. because if the clay is water free the clay is 100% silica. is this correct?
But before drying silica and water constituted only 45% + 10% = 55% of clay. The rest 45% were other substances. Do you think they evaporated during drying?

Suppose wet clay weighs 100 kg. Then silica weighs 45 kg, water weighs 10 kg and other substances also weigh 45 kg. After drying, water evaporates, but silica and other substances remain. What share of the new total volume does silica make up?

paulmdrdo said:
2. A coal contains 2.4% water. After drying, the moisture-free residue contains 71.0% carbon.
Determine the percentage of carbon on the “wet basis.” All percentages are by weight.

for this I have no idea. please give me some assistance here. thanks!
Suppose the orginal coal weighs 100 kg. Then water weighs 2.4 kg, so dry matter, including carbon, weighs 97.6 kg. Of that dry matter carbon makes up 71%. Find the mass of carbon and divide by the original mass, i.e., 100 kg.
 
the silica would still be 45%. Am I correct?

please I need a quick response for this. thanks!
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Suppose wet clay weighs 100 kg. Then silica weighs 45 kg, water weighs 10 kg and other substances also weigh 45 kg. After drying, water evaporates, but silica and other substances remain. What share of the new total volume does silica make up?

paulmdrdo said:
the silica would still be 45%. Am I correct?
No. The total mass (sorry, I mistakenly said volume before) after evaporation is: 45 kg silica + 45 kg other substances = 90 kg. Silica makes up 45 / 90 = 0.5 of that new total mass.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Back
Top