Model that demonstrates conservation of mechanical energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around selecting or creating a model to demonstrate the conservation of mechanical energy for a physics project. Suggested models include a spring with a mass, a roller coaster, and variations of pendulums, though traditional balance balls are restricted. Participants emphasize the importance of simplicity and accessibility in constructing the model, mentioning household materials. The roller coaster idea highlights the transition between potential and kinetic energy as it descends. Overall, the focus is on finding engaging yet straightforward models that effectively illustrate the concept of mechanical energy conservation.
furia
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My physics class is currently invovled with a project regarding conservation of mechanical energy.

I will need to choose or create a model that will demonstrate conservation of mechanical energy, then analyze the model and explain it.

Does anyone know of any model that can be made easily and can demonstrate conservation of mechanical energy in a simple way, such as the balance ball, or pendulum.
( The balance ball and pendulum are restricted models of this project)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about a spring and a ball?
 
Or maybe those cool toys with several metal balls suspended on V-strings all lined up and touching, where you pull one out at one end and let go, and when it hits it knocks out the ball on the other end out to the same max height? Those are fun, and may be different enough from a standard 1-ball pendulum that your instructor will allow it.
 
spring and ball, please go in abit further on that. the balls on v string is also known as the balance ball, so i can't use that
 
By spring and ball, I think Pseudo means a mass on the end of a spring. If you can't use the balance ball, how about a roller coaster? Once you get towed to the top of the first big hill, it's all PE<-->KE from there on down. Maybe even add in some of the upside-down corkscrew sections...
 
maybe something like that, not too complicated or i won't be able to make it out of normal house stuff
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top