I Modeling cosmology..

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Starknakdfopsy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Introducing new models for cosmology, particularly personal theories like a variation on the aether theory, is not permitted in this forum. The discussion emphasizes that all cosmological models must be grounded in established physics. Speculative ideas that deviate from accepted scientific principles are not welcome. The thread was ultimately closed to maintain adherence to forum rules. Personal theories and speculations are discouraged in this community.
Starknakdfopsy
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Introducing models.
Is it ok to introduce a new model for cosmology here? It is a variation on the aether theory I don't think has been noticed or explored specifically and I think has some clout and could use help with speculations.

As all models for cosmological observations are Physics based, it brings up topics that may be contrary to the rules of this forum and I do not want to break them.

Thanks,

Sean B.
 
  • Sad
Likes PeroK
Space news on Phys.org
Starknakdfopsy said:
Is it ok to introduce a new model for cosmology here?
No. Personal theories and personal speculations are not allowed here.

Thread closed.
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe'

Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Observations fit poorly with the Standard Model of Cosmology
Replies
34
Views
4K
I Meaning of the distance between galactic objects in GR
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Questions on the consequence of an evolving dark energy parameter
Replies
1
Views
1K
I New research puts age of the Universe at 26.7 billion years
Replies
6
Views
4K
I Can a scalar field model account for the cosmic redshift?
Replies
20
Views
2K
I Einstein, Friedman and the cosmological constant
Replies
5
Views
2K
I How well do cosmological models explain the observed µ vs. z data?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Is it time to take the 'bang' out of the Big Bang?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Does the Cosmological Principle in any way underpin Big Bang Theory?
Replies
33
Views
3K
B History of Cosmology: 1915-1929 | Einstein, Hubble & GR
Replies
19
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top