Modeling Object Motion in a Viscous Liquid: mg - kv = m(dv/dt)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on modeling the motion of an object in a viscous liquid, specifically addressing the force equation. The resistive force is defined as kv, and the downward direction is taken as positive. The main confusion arises over whether to use mg - kv = m(dv/dt) or mg - kv = m(-dv/dt). It is clarified that the acceleration's sign will indicate the direction of motion, and the object will eventually reach terminal velocity when drag equals weight. Ultimately, the choice of sign in the equation is flexible as long as the directions of other quantities are correctly assigned.
Pseudo Statistic
Messages
391
Reaction score
6
Hey,
I have this homework thing where I have to model an object's motion through a viscous liquid.
I'm to assume that the resistive force directed upward is kv.
Now, I'm going to take the downward direction as positive and the up as negative..
Should my force equation be mg - kv = m(dv/dt) or mg - kv = m(-dv/dt)?
This is confusing me because I know that the acceleration opposes the direction of motion, so should it be dv/dt or -dv/dt?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you know that the objecj is going to fall downwards, so the downwards acceleration will decrease as the drag increases up to the point where the drag is equal to the weight of the object. At which point the acceleration will be zero and the object has reached it's terminal velocity. So the acceleration will be >= 0. Usually when one solves such equations analytically, for say the acceleration, the sign of the obtained value will indicate in which direction the object is accelerating. If you put it in as -a in the equation and the solution gives a positve answer, then we know that the object is in the minus direction. If on the other hand the solution gives the acceleration a negative value, then we know that the acceleration is actually in the positive direction. So it doesn't matter which sign you give it (as long as you do not get the directions of the other quantities wrong thought, in which case you will be analysing a different physical situation!).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top