Modeling Occurrence of First Migration in Breeding Amphibians: Suggestions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wvguy8258
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Suggestions
wvguy8258
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does anyone have advice on a good statistical model for the following? I have a dependent variable that is the day that something occurs for an individual. It can occur on any of X number of days for any of Y individuals. It occurs once for each individual, so once it happens the probability of it occurring again is zero. There are a set of independent variables for each day and individual. I would like to model this as a probability that an individual has the occurrence on a specific day, so this would have to take into account what has happened before. I do not believe that logistic regression will work, because of the fact that once the occurrence happens, that individual is out of the data set. Perhaps a multinomial logistic regression with the reponse being day of occurrence and a set of cumulative independent variables to keep track of what happened previous to each day. I do not think a survival/time-to-event analysis is appropriate because time in this case doesn't matter. If conditions for an occurrence are right on day 1, the fact that it is only 1 day into the study doesn't matter.

By the way, the study is looking at factors that contribute to the timing of first migration to breeding ponds during a year's breeding season of a breeding population of a species of amphibian. All animals in the study (those observed to have migrated to breed) are known to have bred that year. It is common knowledge that warm temperatures in early spring with rain cause this migration, but no good analysis has been done so far using several data sets from different years and geographic locations. Thanks. -seth
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you described ("a multinomial logistic regression with the reponse being day of occurrence and a set of cumulative independent variables to keep track of what happened previous to each day") sounds right.

One place you might look at is the marketing ("sales") literature. I am not very familiar with all aspects of it, but I know that they've used models like this that track cumulative sales growth. There may be other variants that track an individual's disposition to make a purchase, and the timing of it.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top