Modeling plasma instability with electric arc discharges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential application of laser stabilization techniques used in electric arc discharges to fusion plasma. Participants note that while electric arcs are plasmas stabilized by lasers, the significantly higher density of Earth's atmosphere compared to fusion plasma raises questions about the effectiveness of this method in magnetically confined fusion systems. The conversation highlights that plasma pressure is influenced by particle density and temperature, with higher density being desirable but constrained by material limits. The laser-induced effects, such as reduced breakdown voltage and resistivity, create a preferred path for current, but the complete ionization of fusion plasmas complicates the applicability of this mechanism. Overall, the feasibility of using laser stabilization in fusion plasma remains uncertain, particularly outside of startup scenarios.
Colin LeMahieu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I was reading a paper recently about guiding electric arc discharges with lasers. http://loa.ensta-paristech.fr/ilm/uploads/ILM/134_Forestier_discharge_AIPAdvances_2_012151_2012.pdf

Since electric arcs are plasmas and they seem to be stabilized by lasers, could the same principle be applied to fusion plasma?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Colin LeMahieu said:
I was reading a paper recently about guiding electric arc discharges with lasers. http://loa.ensta-paristech.fr/ilm/uploads/ILM/134_Forestier_discharge_AIPAdvances_2_012151_2012.pdf

Since electric arcs are plasmas and they seem to be stabilized by lasers, could the same principle be applied to fusion plasma?
With a quick read of the article, it appears the interest is inducing a more controlled atmospheric discharge, i.e., lightning, such that greater protection of electrical infrastructure is achieved. The Earth's atmosphere is many orders of magnitude greater density than a fusion plasma. It's not clear the advantage of this process for magnetically confined fusion systems. Perhaps the_wolfman can provide some insight.
 
Interesting. I could see how lower density could affect results. Is the lower density because of technical limits to confinement? Higher density would generally be desired if possible, right?
 
Colin LeMahieu said:
Interesting. I could see how lower density could affect results. Is the lower density because of technical limits to confinement? Higher density would generally be desired if possible, right?
The pressure of the plasma is a function of particle density, n, and the temperature, T, by virtue of P = nkT, where k is the Boltzmann constant.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/idegas.html#c1

The plasma pressure is limited by the magnetic pressure and the structural materials confining the plasma. Higher density would be desirable, but we are constrained by the limits on materials.
 
  • Like
Likes Colin LeMahieu
Colin LeMahieu said:
I was reading a paper recently about guiding electric arc discharges with lasers. http://loa.ensta-paristech.fr/ilm/uploads/ILM/134_Forestier_discharge_AIPAdvances_2_012151_2012.pdf

Since electric arcs are plasmas and they seem to be stabilized by lasers, could the same principle be applied to fusion plasma?

The laser pulse creates a partially ionized of column of gas that has a reduced density. These two effects reduce the breakdown voltage and resistivity is the column. Current takes the path of least resistance, so the laser pulse is creating a preferred path for the arc to follow.

Magnetically confined plasmas are usually completely ionized. So its hard to imagine where this mechanism would be applicable except maybe during start up.

It is interesting thato the arcs have such a well defined cylindrical shape.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep and Colin LeMahieu
As far as I know, field strength is a limitation with magnetic confinement fusion plasmas, but not structural limits of materials, not yet.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top