Modeling the Earth and Sun (2 body orbits) using general relativity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Modeling the time evolution of the Earth and Sun using general relativity (GR) presents significant challenges, primarily due to the non-linear nature of the Einstein Field Equations. While Newtonian mechanics provides a straightforward approach, GR complicates the two-body problem, making it intractable without numerical methods. The Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann equations offer approximate solutions under specific conditions, but exact solutions for two-body systems in GR remain elusive. Numerical simulations, often requiring substantial computational resources, are necessary to explore these dynamics accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein Field Equations and their implications in general relativity
  • Familiarity with numerical methods, specifically Runge-Kutta techniques
  • Knowledge of the Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann equations for approximating two-body problems
  • Basic principles of gravitational radiation and its effects on orbital dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann equations for approximating two-body systems in GR
  • Explore numerical simulation techniques for solving differential equations in gravitational contexts
  • Study the impact of gravitational radiation on orbital dynamics in binary systems
  • Investigate existing software tools for simulating gravitational interactions in multi-body systems
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, researchers in gravitational physics, and computational scientists interested in modeling celestial mechanics and the dynamics of multi-body systems under general relativity.

  • #61
1. Random numerical ##g_{ij}## will generate valid ##T_{ij}##, with matter everywhere:

rand01.png


Thus, the difficulty is in generating the black vacuum (zeros), instead of the (white) matter.

2. Combinatorially, we consider a 2x2x2 universe grid, with only 2 matter states (matter ON, and matter OF):

334563456.png


The major difficulty is in generating any (black) vacuum at all in any subsquare. But supposing we have found a solution that turns off any subsquare:

w23452345.png


By symmetry of the cartesian dimensional axis, we can deduce the correct ##g_{ij}## codes to turn off any other single square configuration on the grid. Thus, knowing just 1 single-black-square solution can generate all other single-black-square solutions.

Similarly, know 2 distinct solutions that turns off 2 areas of the grid:

234523454345.png
and
243523452.png


allows us by symmetry to deduce the ##g_{ij}## numbers that will turn off any 2-black-squares on the grid.

Further, knowing 2 distinct solutions that turns off 3 areas of the grid:

2523432.png
and
43523452.png


enables us by symmetry to deduce the ##g_{ij}## numbers that will turn off any 3-black-squares on the grid.

Then, knowing 4 distinct solutions that turns off 4 areas of the grid:
65436543.png
23452342.png
(file limit reached)

allows us by symmetry to turn off any 4-black-squares on the grid.

There are 2 distinct solutions for 5-black-subsquares (ie. 3-white-subsquares).
There are 2 distinct solutions for 6-black-subsquares (ie. 2-white-subsquares).
There is 1 distinct solution for 7-black-subsquares (ie. 1-white-subsquares).
There is 1 distinct trivial solution for 8-black-subsquares (zero ##g_{ij}##).

Not counting the trivial solutions for all-white and all-black configurations, there are ##2+2+4+2+2=10## configuration solutions that must be discovered before we are masters of this universe, ie. are able to generate any of the ##2^8=256## possible matter states, and to evolve any sequence of matter states on this grid, eg:

63456354.gif


3. The unfortunate case of the Kerr solution is that it generates 1 single-white-square at the center of a 3x3 grid, for which no other solution can be deduced by symmetry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
James1238765 said:
1. Random numerical ##g_{ij}## will generate valid ##T_{ij}##, with matter everywhere
In the sense that you can write down any metric you like, compute its Einstein tensor, divide by ##8 \pi##, and call that the "stress-energy tensor", yes. But whether the resulting SET describes anything that could physically exist is a very different question.

James1238765 said:
the difficulty is in generating the black vacuum (zeros), instead of the (white) matter.
On the contrary, solving the EFE for the case of vacuum is considerably easier.

The rest of your post is just handwaving and is getting considerably more off topic for this forum, since personal speculations are off limits.
 
  • #63
The OP question has been answered as well as it can be. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 193 ·
7
Replies
193
Views
16K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K