Modelling Gravitational Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the gravitational motion of two particles, where one particle is stationary and the other has an initial position and velocity. The user is successfully calculating the gravitational force vector but is uncertain about how to incorporate the momentum of the moving particle into the model. They reference Newton's laws of gravitation and motion to derive the necessary equations. A suggestion is made to simplify the model by initially assuming a constant gravitational force to validate the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly integrating momentum into the gravitational motion equations.
microguy
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Modelling "Gravitational" Motion

Hi All,

I am new here and this is not a homework question... I'm turning 40 this year and my retention of physics is low to say the least. I am trying to rekindle some knowledge... Just for fun!

I am trying to use a spreadsheet to model the motion of a system of two particles under gravitational-type forces where one particle has a fixed position and the other is given an initial position and velocity vector. Both particles also have a known mass, e.g.,

P1(m1,x1,y1) [fixed position]
P2(m2,x2,y2,v2)

The way I'm approaching this, P2 should move predictably in a time-slice dt. P2 is influenced by its momentum as well as the "gravitational" attraction to P1.

I can figure the "gravitational" force vector with no problem.

The thing I am hung up on is how to figure the contribution of P2's momentum. I'm not even sure I'm using the correct term here. Once I know how to calculate this vector correctly, I think I can do the math.

Please let me know if anything is unclear.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Maybe something along these lines

F=Gm1m2/(distance between the masses)2 [Newton's law of gravitation]

F=m2(change in velocity)/(change in time) [Newton's 2nd law of motion]

Combining the two laws

Gm1m2(change in time)/(distance between the masses)2=m2(change in velocity)

You can cancel m2 out, and start with 1D motion to see if it makes sense. There's a minus sign somewhere you have to take care of, but I don't remember - just choose it so that gravity attracts, not repels the masses.

Edit: Actually, you can start out with a calculation in which gravity is constant (ie. not dependent on the distance between the masses), just to see if it makes sense. Of course, that result will only be correct over short distances, but it sometimes helps to start with a simple situation.
 
Last edited:


Thanks for that! This makes sense and you helped me notice something I was not doing quite right.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top