Modifying the Fine Structure Constant to Incorporate Self-Energy Interactions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the fine structure constant's dimensionless nature, derived from the cancellation of terms involving e², Planck's constant, and the speed of light. The Coulomb energy expression shows that e² has dimensions of energy times length, while h-bar times c also shares these dimensions, leading to a dimensionless ratio. Participants explore whether the fine structure constant can be expressed as a function of energy to relate to the Lorentz force, questioning if it can be represented as α(s)/s or α(s)/(s-π(s)). The potential modification of the fine structure constant to include self-energy interactions is proposed, suggesting a new definition α'(s) that satisfies a specific equation. This exploration highlights the intricate relationship between fundamental constants and quantum electrodynamics.
Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
How do (e^2)/(4Pi x epsilon x Planck constant x speed of light) cancel to give one and make the fine structure constant dimensionless?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Coulomb energy is V = e2/r, so e2 has dimensions of energy*length. On the other hand, h-bar*c = 197.5 MeV-f also has dimensions of energy*length, so the ratio of the two expressions is dimensionless.
 
Does anyone know if by making the fine structure a function of energy, can one capture the Lorentz force as proportional to:

\frac{\alpha(s)}{s}

where s is a Mandelstam variable and \alpha is the fine-structure constant?

Or does one have to resort to:

\frac{\alpha(s)}{s-\pi(s)}

where \pi is the electromagnetic interaction of the photon with itself (the self-energy)?

Can one modify the fine structure constant to incorporate \pi(s) by defining the new fine structure constant \alpha'(s) as the value that makes the following equation true:

\frac{\alpha'(s)}{s}=\frac{\alpha(s)}{s-\pi(s)}
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top