Modular Arithmetic and Exponential Towers: Solving the Power Tower Puzzle

  • Thread starter Thread starter phantasmagoriun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Puzzle Tower
AI Thread Summary
To find the remainder of a tower of three thousand 7's when divided by 11, the discussion suggests using modular arithmetic techniques. The first step involves calculating 7 mod 11, then iteratively finding 7 raised to the power of the previous result, which leads to a repeating cycle. An alternative approach involves applying Euler's theorem, reducing the last exponent modulo 10 using Fermat's Little Theorem, which simplifies the calculations significantly. The goal is to determine the remainder of a tower of 2999 7's modulo 10 to complete the final exponentiation. This problem is new to the participants, and they aim to explore it further in their group meeting.
phantasmagoriun
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Consider an exponential tower of three thousand 7's.
What is the remainder when you divide the tower by 11?
Note that this notation means 7^(7^7) not (7^7)^7. So it's kinda like the Ackermann Function maybe?
The final answer must be given as a single integer in the range 0-10.


Anyone got any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can just do a (sort of) brute force method:
Find 7 mod 11 = a1
Find 7 ^ a1 mod 11 = a2
Find 7 ^ a2 mod 11 = a3
...
Find 7 ^ a(n-1) mod 11 = an where an = a1
Then the top of the exponent tower will cycle through the sequence a1...an-1 as you evaluate it and all you have to do is count correctly so you land on the right element of the sequence.

This method is easy by calculator but harder by hand. There is probably a better way to do this.
 
\phi(11)=10
So, from Fermat's Little Theorem, we could reduce the last exponent modulo 10 without altering the result.

So, if we knew the remainder of a tower of 2999 7's when divided by 10 then we'd only have one exponentiation left, right?
 
Thanks for the help. I'm going to bring this stuff into my group meeting and see what we can do with it. (None of us have seen this type of problem before, nor worked with mod, so hopefully we can figure it out)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top