Modular arithmetic on vector spaces

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining if the set U of polynomials that satisfy u(3) = u(-2) = 0 forms a subspace of the polynomial vector space P(x) over the field \mathbb{F}. To verify this, it must be shown that U is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. The polynomials in U can be expressed in the form (x - 3)(x + 2)v(x), where v(x) is another polynomial. The participants also discuss the implications of modular arithmetic in this context and how to define the complementary set W, which consists of polynomials not satisfying the conditions of U. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in mathematical statements and definitions.
gruba
Messages
203
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let U is the set of all polynomials u on field \mathbb F such that u(3)=u(-2)=0. Check if U is the subspace of the set of all polynomials P(x) on \mathbb F and if it is, determine the set W such that P(x)=U\oplus W.

Homework Equations


-Polynomial vector spaces
-Subspaces
-Modular arithmetic

The Attempt at a Solution


U=\{u(x):u(x)\mod (x-3)=0 \land u(x)\mod (x+2)= 0\}

U is the subspace of P(x) iff

1) \forall u_1,u_2\in U\Rightarrow u_1+u_2\in U

2) \forall u\in U,\forall \alpha\in \mathbb F\Rightarrow \alpha u\in U

How to check if U is the subspace of P(x)?

Assuming U is the subspace of P(x)\Rightarrow

P(x)=U\oplus W=U+W \mod n

where n should be the total number of polynomials in U and W.

This means that W is the set of all polynomials u(x) defined as
W=\{u(x): u(3)\neq u(-2)\neq 0 \lor u(3)\neq u(-2)=0\lor u(3)=u(-2)\neq 0\}

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gruba said:

Homework Statement


Let U is the set of all polynomials u on field \mathbb F such that u(3)=u(-2)=0. Check if U is the subspace of the set of all polynomials P(x) on \mathbb F and if it is, determine the set W such that P(x)=U\oplus W.

Homework Equations


-Polynomial vector spaces
-Subspaces
-Modular arithmetic

The Attempt at a Solution


U=\{u(x):u(x)\mod (x-3)=0 \land u(x)\mod (x+2)= 0\}
How does modular arithmetic come into this problem? In the problem statement, you say only that u(3) = 0 and u(-2) = 0.
gruba said:
U is the subspace of P(x) iff

1) \forall u_1,u_2\in U\Rightarrow u_1+u_2\in U

2) \forall u\in U,\forall \alpha\in \mathbb F\Rightarrow \alpha u\in U
Minor point, but ##\Rightarrow## is not appropriate in the above. It should be used when one statement implies another statement.##\forall u \in U## is not a statement (i.e., a sentence whose truth value can be determined).
gruba said:
How to check if U is the subspace of P(x)?

Assuming U is the subspace of P(x)\Rightarrow

P(x)=U\oplus W=U+W \mod n

where n should be the total number of polynomials in U and W.

This means that W is the set of all polynomials u(x) defined as
W=\{u(x): u(3)\neq u(-2)\neq 0 \lor u(3)\neq u(-2)=0\lor u(3)=u(-2)\neq 0\}

Is this correct?
 
Any polynomial, u(x), of degree n, such that u(3)= u(-2)= 0 is of the form (x- 3)(x+ 2)v(x) where v is a polynomial of degree n- 2. To show this is a subspace of the space of all polynomials, you only need to show that this set is closed under addition and scalar multiplication- If u(x)= (x- 3)(x+ 2)v(x) and w(x)= (x- 3)(x+ 2)y(x), what can you say about u+ w? What can you say about au where a is a number?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K