Modulus for X Axis: Can You Stop Negative Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madmike159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Modulus
madmike159
Gold Member
Messages
369
Reaction score
0
y = |x| can't go below the y-axis because a Modulus is always positive, but can you get a modulus that stops x going negitive? Could this be used for things like radioactive decay where the graph should go in -x but doesn't because you can't have - time?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x, as a function of y, x= |y| does that. I am not clear why you say "you can't have negative time". There is no such thing as an "absolute" time. In any application of mathematics, to, say, physics, you are free to choose which moment you will call "t= 0". Negative values of t simply mean times before your chosen starting point.

For example, if I have a radioactive substance, with half-life \lambda, that, at time 0 (say, when I start the experiment) has mass m= A grams, then as time t, it will have mass m= A(1/2)^{\lambda t}. Taking t< 0 will give a mass greater than A, which is a perfectly reasonable answer: before time t= 0, it had greater mass than at time t= 0.
 
"Taking t< 0 will give a mass greater than A, which is a perfectly reasonable answer: before time t= 0, it had greater mass than at time t= 0."

Unless it was created at some time as a by-product of a nuclear reaction.
 
Really all I wanted to know is if there is an opposite of the modulus function.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top