Molar binding energy of uranium-235 nuclei

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the molar binding energy of uranium-235 nuclei, with a given mass of 1 uranium nucleus at 235.0439u. The user correctly applies the mass-energy equivalence formula, E=Δmc^2, but initially omits Avogadro's number in their calculations. The method is validated, confirming that nucleons, which include protons and neutrons, are appropriately named. The final calculated molar binding energy is approximately 1.7324x10^11 kJ/mol. Clarifications are made regarding the correct terminology and the necessity of including Avogadro's number for accurate molar calculations.
deezer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the molar binding energy of uranium 235 nuclei?
Givem: The mass of 1 uranium nuecli is 235.0439u

Homework Equations



E=Δmc^2

The Attempt at a Solution



mass of nucleons: m=92P+143n=236.90814u

mass of nucleus: m=234.99343u

Δm=239.90814-234.99343u=1.9147u

Emolar=(1.9147u)(3x10^8m/s)^2(1.67x10^-27kg/u)
=2.8778x10^-10 J/nucleus (6.02x10^23 nuclei/mole)(1kJ/1000J)
=1.7324x10^11 kJ/mol

Is my answer correct? Also did I name the nucleons/nucleus correctly? I'm not sure if I should have called them what I called them since the nucleons are the nucleus technically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nucleon is a collective name for the neutron and the proton. These are the two constituents of the atomic nucleus.
I did not check your numbers, but the method looks correct, except you left out the Avogadro's number in the first line.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Nucleon is a collective name for the neutron and the proton. These are the two constituents of the atomic nucleus.
I did not check your numbers, but the method looks correct, except you left out the Avogadro's number in the first line.

ehild

So what should I change the names to?

And why do I need Avogadro's number in the first line?
 
deezer said:
So what should I change the names to?

And why do I need Avogadro's number in the first line?

Emolar=(1.9147u)(3x10^8m/s)^2(1.67x10^-27kg/u)

You used the correct name for protons and neutrons. They are nucleons.
I quoted your first line for Emolar but it was the binding energy of one nucleus.

ehild
 
ehild said:
You used the correct name for protons and neutrons. They are nucleons.
I quoted your first line for Emolar but it was the binding energy of one nucleus.

ehild

It is molar, I converted it to kJ/mol.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top