Molecular Hamiltonian: H-Nucleus and Electron Interactions for H2 Molecule

  • Thread starter Thread starter OmniReader
  • Start date Start date
OmniReader
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Wikipedia distinguishes between the full "Molecular Hamiltonian" and the "Coulomb Hamiltonian" with which you solve the Schrodinger equation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_Hamiltonian.

how is full molecular Hamiltonian written for a H nucleus and electron or H2 molecule?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OmniReader said:
how is full molecular Hamiltonian written for a H nucleus and electron or H2 molecule?
You usually do not use the full molecular Hamiltonian, but add relativistic corrections, such as spin-orbit coupling, to the Coulomb Hamiltonian.

Actually, I'm not sure that would be such a thing as the "full" molecular Hamiltonian. You would use the Dirac instead of the Scrhödinger equation to get all relativistic effects to be taken into account.
 
If you see the Hamiltonian specified on page 3 here: http://www.phys.ubbcluj.ro/~vchis/cursuri/cspm/course2.pdf

What would I add to that to make it as exact as we know how to make it? That is, if relativistic corrections are reasonably easy to make. Spin-orbit coupling is a purely relativistic effect?
 
Let me start by answering
Big-Daddy said:
ISpin-orbit coupling is a purely relativistic effect?
No, I was a bit clumsy in my phrasing. In constructing a relativistic theory for the electron, which Dirac did, you end up needing spin to construct an equation that is Lorentz-invarient. But spin is not in itself a relativistic phenomenon, but an instrinsic property of the electron.

If you start from the Dirac equation for one electron and assume that relativistic effects are small, you can obtain a series expansion in terms of ##v/c## that you can use as corrective terms (or perturbation) in the Hamiltonian for the hydrogen atom. Spin-orbit coupling is one of those terms. Actually, you get (assuming a fixed nucleus)
$$
\hat{H} = m_e c^2 + \frac{\hat{P}^2}{2m_e} + V(R) - \frac{\hat{P}^4}{8 m_e^3 c^2} + \frac{1}{2 m_e^2 c^2} \frac{1}{R} \frac{d V(R)}{dR} \hat{L} \cdot \hat{S} + \frac{\hbar^2}{8 m_e^2 c^2} \Delta V(R) + \ldots
$$
The terms are in order: (1) mass energy of the electron; (2) kinetic energy of the electron; (3) Coulomb potential; (4) relativistic correction to the momentum; (5) spin-orbit coupling; (6) Darwin term (due to the Compton wavelength of the electron).

Note that the interaction between the spin of the electron and the spin of the nucleus is not included here, but can be added as an additional term.

Big-Daddy said:
If you see the Hamiltonian specified on page 3 here: http://www.phys.ubbcluj.ro/~vchis/cursuri/cspm/course2.pdf

What would I add to that to make it as exact as we know how to make it?
For molecules (and for atoms with more than one electron), things are more complicated. You have additional terms due to spin-spin interactions between electrons.
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top