Moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy prob

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the acceleration of a spool of wire unwound under a constant force. The solution involves understanding the relationship between forces and torques acting on the spool, specifically how friction and the applied force contribute to the net force and torque equations. The instructor's approach combined the forces in the same direction for the linear equation while treating the torques as opposing due to their directions relative to the center of mass. This distinction clarifies why the friction force is subtracted in the torque equation despite being in the same direction as the applied force. Overall, the key takeaway is the importance of analyzing forces and torques separately to understand their effects on the motion of the spool.
pb23me
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spool of wire mass m and radius r is unwound under a constant force F. Assuming that the spool is a uniform solid cylinder that does not slip, show that the acceleration of the center of the mass is 4F/3m


Homework Equations


F+f=ma
f=ma-F
\tau =I\alpha=Fr-fr



The Attempt at a Solution

My instructor worked this out in class and got the answer,but there was one thing that i didnt understand and hope someone can clarify this for me. When he did the force equation he put F+f=ma because friction and the force applied are in the same direction.Then when he did the net torque equation \tau=I\alpha=Fr-fr now it seems he switched the direction of friction? The problem worked out correctly this way but i don't understand why the direction of friction changed?
 

Attachments

  • tn.jpg
    tn.jpg
    1.1 KB · Views: 418
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's because friction acts below the center of mass (CM) while the pulling force acts above the CM. Thus the forces point in the same direction (they add), but the torques about the CM subtract because one would tend to rotate the spool clockwise and the other counterclockwise.
 
wow i never even thought of that...thank you
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top