Moment of Inertia and two uniform solid spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a system of two uniform solid spheres connected by a rod. The correct approach involves using the parallel axis theorem to account for the distance between the axis of rotation and the spheres. The moment of inertia is derived as I = 4/5MR0^2 + M(1.8R0)^2, leading to an actual value that differs from the theoretical calculation. A percentage error of approximately 11% is identified when comparing the theoretical and actual moments of inertia. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly identifying the distance used in calculations.
meganw
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two uniform solid spheres of mass M and radius R0 are connected by a thin (massless) rod of length 1.6R0 so that the centers are 3.6R0 apart.

(a) Determine the moment of inertia of this system about an axis perpendicular to the rod at its center.

________________ MR^2

(b) What would be the percentage error if the masses of each sphere were assumed to be concentrated at their centers and a very simple calculation could be made?

Homework Equations



mr^2 = moment of inertia for a point mass

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused. I guess it's not a point mass because I keep doing it that way but I keep getting the wrong answer. (2*1.8)=3.6 1.8 is the R and 2 for the second M.

What's the real formula I should be using for this? Thanks! I need help. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculate the distance between the centre of rotation and the spheres...
You can't treat the spheres as point masses...their MI should be calculated about the axis of rotation as 2MR^2/5 AND added to get the inertia for the system.for this you must use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the MI of spheres about the axis of rotation...
 
Okay I tried it again using the parallel axis theorem but I got it wrong:

I=Icm +Mh^2

Icm=2/5*MRo^2
Mh^2=M*(1.6Ro)^2

Multiply them by two for the two masses:

I=4/5MR0^2+5.12MRo^2
=5.92 * MRo^2

It says that's wrong. What am I doing incorrectly?
 
How did you get h = 1.6Ro?
 
h

OH, Dr. Al, you're right! I was using 1.6 instead of 1.8.

Which gives you 11% error because you just do 2(M)(1.8 Ro)^2 which is 6.48 and % error is Theoretical (7.28) -Actual (6.48) / Theoretical = 10.98% error.

Thank you! =) You've really helped me and I really appreciate it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top