Moment of Inertia: Does Mass Matter?

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia of a 2-D triangle about its center of mass is independent of its actual mass, as indicated by the formula I = (bh^3)/36, which applies to triangles of the same dimensions. This formula represents the area moment of inertia, distinct from the mass moment of inertia used in rotational dynamics. The mass moment of inertia does depend on the total mass of the object and is calculated using the mass of individual elements multiplied by the square of their distance from the axis of rotation. It is important to differentiate between area moment of inertia, used for bending calculations, and mass moment of inertia, relevant for rotational problems. Understanding this distinction clarifies how mass influences inertia in different contexts.
mnandlall
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was wondering if the moment of inertia of a 2-D triangle about its center of mass depends on the actual mass of the triangle. Formulas that I have found say that I = (bh^3)/36. Does this mean that the moment of inertia of triangles with the same dimensions will be the same about their center of mass regardless of their actual mass? I know that if you were taking the moment of Inertia about an arbitrary axis then the mass would come into play, according to the parallel axis theorem, but I'm not so sure about it when the inertia is about the center of mass.

Any help clearing this matter up for me would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
different "moments of inertia"

The moment of inertia (a.k.a., mass moment of inertia) of any object most certainly depends on its total mass, regardless of chosen axis. That formula looks like an area moment of inertia (a.k.a, second moment of inertia), which is something quite different from "ordinary" moment of inertia and is used to predict resistance to bending. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_moment_of_area"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alright, this makes a lot of sense. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
Please don't get confused with the area M.I & mass M.I. Both are different. area M.I is normally used when u calculate the bending moments and bending stresses in design of beams and structures. where as mass M.I is used in case of problems related to rotational dynamics. In Mass M.I the mass of the rotating object defenitely plays a role. Its value is calculated by multiplying the mass of individual elements and the square of distance between the element and the axis of rotation. Ie I=Mr^2... Hope its clear now...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top