Moment of inertia flywheel mass problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia of a flywheel with mass M, which has four holes cut out of a uniform disk. The initial approach involved subtracting the moment of inertia of the holes from that of the solid disk, but the calculations were found to be incorrect. After several attempts, the correct mass of the whole disk was identified, leading to a revised formula for the total moment of inertia. The final expression for the moment of inertia is complex but approaches the expected value of 1/2 MR² as the hole radius approaches zero. The participants emphasize the importance of careful calculations and understanding the physics behind the problem.
bowma166
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the moment of inertia of a flywheel of mass M made by cutting four large holes of radius r out of a uniform disk of radius R. The holes are centered at a distance R/2 from the center of the flywheel.

Here is a very poorly drawn diagram of the disk. Sorry for how crappy it is.
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/4131/flywheelro2.jpg

Homework Equations


I=\int R^{2}dm
(Is this necessary? I don't think it is given the next two equations.)

I_{disk}=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}

I=I_{CM}+md^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution


You can just add/subtract moment of inertias of things, right? I'm not sure about that but that's what I tried.
If the disk didn't have holes, then I=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}. But it does... the holes are of mass
\frac{\pi r^{2}}{\pi R^{2}}M=\frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}M
and are a distance R/2 from the center. So the total moment of inertia should be

I=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}-4\left(\frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}\right)M\left(\frac{R}{2}\right)^{2}=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}-Mr^{2}

right? It makes sense because as r -> 0, I -> I_disk, but I really have no idea if it is right or not. Thanks!

::edit:: Just kidding, I know I did that wrong... I'm working on redoing it now.

::edit again::
Okay. This time I think I may have done it more correctly.
The moment of inertia of each small disk about the center of the big disk should be
I_{hole}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}Mr^{2}+\left(\frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}M\right)\left(\frac{R}{2}\right)^{2}=\frac{Mr^{4}}{2R^{2}}+\frac{Mr^{2}}{4}
so the total moment of inertia is the big disk's I minus four times the holes' I, right?
I=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}-4\left(\frac{Mr^{4}}{2R^{2}}+\frac{Mr^{2}}{4}\right)=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}-\frac{2Mr^{4}}{R^{2}}-Mr^{2}

So...

I=\frac{1}{2}M\left(R^{2}-\frac{4r^{4}}{R^{2}}-2r^{2}\right)

That seems kind of messy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
bowma166 said:
That seems kind of messy.

Sometimes things are that way :smile: Blame it on your messy disk.

You can add/subtract moments as long as they are about the same axis; so your second solution is fine.
 
Oh, I didn't read the problem carefully enough. The flywheel has mass M, not the original disk...
 
Oh... Does that not work that way? Hm. Well I tried again, finding the mass of the thing if the holes weren't removed and then replacing M in my calculations with that.
The whole mass would have been
M_{whole}=\frac{Mr^{2}}{R^{2}-4r^{2}}
right?

I got something extremely messy for my final answer then... So messy that I'm pretty sure it can't be right. I think?

I_{total}=Mr^{2}\left(\frac{R^{2}}{2R^{2}-8r^{2}}-\frac{2r^{4}}{R^{4}-4R^{2}r^{2}}-\frac{2r^{2}}{R^{2}-4r^{2}}\right)

::edit:: Yeah, that can't be right... Oh damn! I accidentally switched r and R in my calculation of the mass. Time to do that all over again.

::edit 2::
Okay. With the correct (I hope) mass with MR2 on top instead of Mr2, I got...
I_{total}=\frac{MR^{4}-2Mr^{4}\left(2+R^{2}\right)}{2R^{2}-8r^{2}}

\lim_{r\rightarrow0}I_{total}=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}
for this answer, so it has the possibility of being correct. Maybe.
 
Last edited:
bowma166 said:
::edit 2::
Okay. With the correct (I hope) mass with MR2 on top instead of Mr2, I got...
I_{total}=\frac{MR^{4}-2Mr^{4}\left(2+R^{2}\right)}{2R^{2}-8r^{2}}

\lim_{r\rightarrow0}I_{total}=\frac{1}{2}MR^{2}
for this answer, so it has the possibility of being correct. Maybe.

Yeah, it is a messy problem - you just have to be confident that you haven't made any errors in the process. For example you cannot add 2 to R^2 since the dimensions are all wrong :smile:
 
But I got the (2+R2) from factoring 4Mr4 + 2MR2r4... Doesn't that work? Sigh. I give up on this problem. I'll just hope there isn't one like it on the test, hah.
 
Your solution is correct, in that you've understood the physics. It is just a matter of going back and checking your math again. Good luck on the test!
 
Ah, so finding the mass if there was nothing removed,
M_{disk}=\frac{MR^{2}}{R^{2}-4r^{2}},
and calculating everything as I did with that is the right way to do things? Good. I'm not going to bother checking over the math though. Thanks for the help!
 
Back
Top