Calculating Moment of Inertia for Rod w/ Weights at Ends

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a rod with weights at each end, the parallel axis theorem is recommended. This theorem allows the consideration of the weights as two cylinders, simplifying the calculation by adding the term mr² for each mass. The approach involves treating the axis of rotation as passing through the center of the rod, which aligns with the calculations derived from cylinder equations. The discussion confirms that this method effectively yields accurate results for the moment of inertia. Understanding these theorems is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
jfrusciante
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
My problem is trying to calculate the moment of inertia for a rod with two weights on the each end (like the type weightlifters lift) turning in a horizontal plane with a wire fixed to the middle of the rod.

How do you calculate this? I suppose it could be seen as two cylinders, one small radius big thickness, one large radius small thickness, but how do i sum these together and how do i calculate this.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moment of inertia

Try using the parallel axis and perpendicular axis theorems.

Parallel axis theorem: The moment of inertia (MoI) of a body about any axis parallel to an axis passing through its center of mass (CoM) is equal to the sum of the MoI about the CoM and its mass*(the distance between the two axes ).

Perpendicular axis theorem. The sum of MoI's of a plane body about two perpendicular axes through its plane is equal to the MoI of the body about an axis perpendicular to the plane and passing through the point of intersection of the two previous axes.

tell me if that helps.

spacetime
http://www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
Yes it does spacetime, the parallel axis theorem seems to be what i required because it appears to allow me to just regard the masses as two cylinders with the axis of rotation through their centres. This allows me to simply add mr^2 to the equation for a cylinder, (i think). That also works damn well with the results i have picked up from my investigation.

Thanks for your help.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top