Moment of inertia of a charged spinning top

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia of a charged spinning top remains unchanged when exposed to an electromagnetic field, as it is solely dependent on the object's mass and geometry. While the electric field can generate forces and torques that affect the top's motion, it does not alter the moment of inertia itself. The discussion highlights the distinction between moment of inertia and concepts like momentum, emphasizing that the former is a static property. The analogy of a ballerina executing fouettes illustrates that external forces do not modify the moment of inertia. Overall, the moment of inertia is a fundamental characteristic that does not vary with motion or external fields.
JCOM44
How can I calculate the moment of inertia of a spinning top with charge Q submerged in an electromagnetic field?

I've already calculated it for the case with no charge, but I don't know how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not aware of any context where charge has anything to do with the moment of inertia.
 
But the electric field generates a dipolar moment, which makes the spinning top rotate different affecting the moment of inertia, isn't that right?
 
That sounds to me like an object with a particular moment of inertia, based only on the location of it's mass, reacting to a force from the electric field. The moment of inertia is not a function of the force field.
 
JCOM44 said:
isn't that right

No.

The moment of inertia is the same. The forces and torques on the top could be different, but the moment of inertia is the same.
 
  • Like
Likes Nidum and FactChecker
Can't I consider the dipolar moment as an electromagnetic analogue of the moment of inertia?
 
I don't know what good that will do.
 
Then would you say that when we have a charged spinning top with a defined moment of inertia and it is suddenly exposed to an electromagnetic field, the way it rotates won't change?
 
If the field applies a force or torque to the top, it's motion will change. But it's moment of inertia will not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Nidum and vanhees71
  • #10
Maybe it will help if I put it this way: would anything change if you put a (charged) ballerina in an electromagnetic field to execute her fouettes?



Ballerina's would make excellent physicists.
 
  • #11
An object's moment of inertia is merely the extent to which it resists rotational acceleration about a particular axis. It's a product of the object's mass and dimensions, it actually has nothing to do with motion.

Take the moment of inertia of a solid sphere for example, which can be expressed as
$$I=\frac{2}{5}mr^2$$
As you can see, motion doesn't play a part whatsoever (we're talking classically here).
 
  • #12
Even a force like friction doesn't change the moment of inertia.

Perhaps the OP is confusing momentum and moment of inertia?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top