Moment of inertia of a half disk about an axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moments of inertia for a half disk about the x-axis. There is confusion regarding the correct expression for the moment of inertia, with one formulation using sin²(φ) and the other using cos²(φ). Participants clarify that both integrals yield the same result, regardless of the angle definition. The importance of consistent angle definitions between the student and instructor is highlighted. Ultimately, the integral's outcome remains unchanged, allowing the student to proceed with confidence.
vbrasic
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider a half disk (of uniform density) with the flat end lying on the x-axis, symmetric about the y-axis (i.e. being cut into two quarters by the y-axis). Calculate the moments of inertia about each of the axes.

Homework Equations


$$I_{rr}=\sum_{i}m_ir_i^2$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I just need some making sure that I'm setting up the problem correctly.

The distance to the x-axis from any point on the disk is ##y##. Or, alternatively, ##r\sin{\phi}.## So we find that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\sin^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi,$$ where ##\rho## is the mass density per unit area. However, my instructor has in his notes that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\cos^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi.$$ I'm not sure why that would be, as the distance from any point to the axis of rotation (x in the case of ##I_{xx}## is ##y=r\sin{\rho}.##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vbrasic said:

Homework Statement


Consider a half disk (of uniform density) with the flat end lying on the x-axis, symmetric about the y-axis (i.e. being cut into two quarters by the y-axis). Calculate the moments of inertia about each of the axes.

Homework Equations


$$I_{rr}=\sum_{i}m_ir_i^2$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I just need some making sure that I'm setting up the problem correctly.

The distance to the x-axis from any point on the disk is ##y##. Or, alternatively, ##r\sin{\phi}.## So we find that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\sin^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi,$$ where ##\rho## is the mass density per unit area. However, my instructor has in his notes that, $$I_{xx}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\cos^2{\phi})\rho\,rdrd\phi.$$ I'm not sure why that would be, as the distance from any point to the axis of rotation (x in the case of ##I_{xx}## is ##y=r\sin{\rho}.##
I think you have it right. Maybe the instructor wrote it down wrong.
 
Have you and your instructor defined angle ##\phi## the same way or is one ##90^o - \phi## of the other?
vbrasic said:
... in the case of ##I_{xx}## is ##y=r \sin \rho##.
You mean ##y=r \sin \phi##.
 
kuruman said:
Have you and your instructor defined angle ##\phi## the same way or is one ##90^o - \phi## of the other?

You mean ##y=r \sin \phi##.

Yes -- and not that I know of.
 
OK, then you need to ask yourself, "does it make any difference?" Is the area under the ##\cos^2(\phi)## curve from ##0## to ##\pi## different from the area under the ##\sin^2(\phi)## curve? Draw the curves and see for yourself.
 
kuruman said:
OK, then you need to ask yourself, "does it make any difference?" Is the area under the ##\cos^2(\phi)## curve from ##0## to ##\pi## different from the area under the ##\sin^2(\phi)## curve? Draw the curves and see for yourself.
Yeah, it wouldn't make a difference. The integral evaluates to the same result either way.
 
vbrasic said:
Yeah, it wouldn't make a difference. The integral evaluates to the same result either way.
Yes, and if you want to satisfy your curiosity, you may have to ask your instructor about the definition of ##\phi##, otherwise leave it alone.
 
Back
Top