Moment of Inertia of a turntable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular velocity of a turntable after a lump of putty sticks to its edge. The conservation of angular momentum is applied, with the initial angular momentum calculated as mv²R/3. The moment of inertia for the turntable is derived using the parallel-axis theorem, resulting in I₁ = (11/9)mR², while the putty's contribution is I₂ = (4/9)mR². The total moment of inertia is I = (5/3)mR², leading to the conclusion that the angular velocity ω of the putty/turntable system is ω = (2v)/(5R). This analysis highlights the importance of correctly applying the parallel-axis theorem and understanding the contributions of both the turntable and the putty.
Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform circular turntable of mass 2m and radius R is at rest in space. Koko throws a lump of putty of mass m and speed v toward the edge of the turntable so that it sticks at the extreme edge of the turntable at R.

Using conservation of L, show that the angular velocity ω of the putty/turntable system after the collision is \omega=\frac{2v}{5R}


Homework Equations


Parallel-axis theorem. Conservation of angular momentum


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the center of mass of the putty/turntable system to be R/3. I set my origin to be there. For the initial angular momentum, that is before the putty sticks to the turntable, I get mv2R/3.

For the final angular momentum I get the moment of inertia times the angular velocity. My problem is in determining what the right moment of inertia is.

Why can't I just use the parallel axis theorem applied to the putty and the turntable to find the moment of inertia? I've done mR^2 for the putty, plus 4/9mR^2 by the parallel axis theorem, plus another mr^2 from the disk(since it's mass is 2, the half cancels) plus 1/9 mR^2 by the parallel axis theorem?

So why is this wrong though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Raziel2701 said:
Why can't I just use the parallel axis theorem applied to the putty and the turntable to find the moment of inertia? I've done mR^2 for the putty, plus 4/9mR^2 by the parallel axis theorem, plus another mr^2 from the disk(since it's mass is 2, the half cancels) plus 1/9 mR^2 by the parallel axis theorem?

So why is this wrong though?
You have the right idea but simply made a few mistakes. For the turntable, you have
$$I_1 = I_{1,\rm cm} + Md_1^2 = \frac 12 MR^2 + M(R/3)^2 = \frac{11}{18} MR^2$$ where ##M## is the mass of the turntable. Setting ##M=2m##, you get ##I_1 = (11/9)mR^2##. You used the wrong mass in the ##md^2## term of the parallel-axis theorem.

For the putty, as you're modeling it as a point particle, you have ##I_{2,\rm cm} = 0##, not ##mR^2## as you assumed, so its contribution to the moment of inertia of the system is just ##I_2 = md_2^2 = m(2R/3)^2 = (4/9) mR^2##.

The moment of inertia of the system about its center of mass is therefore ##I=I_1+I_2 = (5/3)mR^2##. Using your value of ##L##, you'll get the expected result for the angular velocity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top