Moment of inertia of hollow cylinder, axis orthogonal to length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia of a hollow cylinder with an axis orthogonal to its length, referencing the Feynman Lectures on Physics. The initial approach involved slicing the cylinder into thin rods and applying the parallel axis theorem, resulting in an incorrect formula: I = M (L^2 / 12 + r^2 / 2). The error was identified as treating the hollow cylinder incorrectly, leading to a successful recalculation using concentric hollow cylinders, which aligned with the correct value in table 19-2 of the lectures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic knowledge of calculus for integration
  • Experience with the Feynman Lectures on Physics, specifically section 19
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for hollow cylinders
  • Learn about the parallel axis theorem in detail
  • Explore integration techniques for calculating moments of inertia
  • Review Feynman Lectures on Physics, focusing on sections 19-2 and 19-4
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, educators teaching moment of inertia concepts, and anyone interested in applying calculus to physical problems.

jds17
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am working through the Feynman lectures on physics and trying to calculate the moment of inertia stated in the title.
(the taxis of rotation going through c.m., orthogonal to length).
My approach is to slice the cylinder into thin rods along the length, using the parallel taxis theorem and the result for a rod.
Unfortunately, I get as result: I = M ( L^2 / 12 + r^2 / 2). I.e. the last numerator comes out as 2 instead of 4, as stated in section
19-2. The corresponding expression comes from summing up dm sum( z_i ^ 2), where dm is the mass of a single rod and z_i
the height of the rod's center of inertia. Perhaps my mistake lies in handling the 2-dim slices as 3-dim rods?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would slice the cylinder into rings instead. It makes integration far easier.
 
jds17 said:
My approach is to slice the cylinder into thin rods along the length, using the parallel taxis theorem and the resultat for a rod.
Unfortunately, I get as result. I = M ( L^2 / 12 + r^2 / 2). I.e. the last numerator comes out as 2 instead of 4, as stated in section
19-4.
Your method looks OK to me. Feynman lists (in table 19-2) the moment of inertia of a solid cylinder.
 
@Doc Al: Thank you for your reply, I took the cylinder as a hollow one, and this seems to be my mistake. I will try
to do the calculation again for the solid cylinder as soon as I get back home.

@K^2: thank you, too, but I wanted to find out what was wrong with my thinking instead of doing a different
calculation. I will try yours, too, although it seemed more complicated when I first considered it
 
Hi, everything turned out nicely, considering a partition into concentric hollow cylinders, adding their M.I.s (calculated as before) up and going to the limit gives the answer in table 19-2!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K