Moment of inertia of spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the moment of inertia of a thin spherical shell, specifically the derivation of the equations used in the calculation. The user seeks clarification on the integral expressions for Ix, Iy, and Iz, particularly how x^2 relates to y^2 + z^2 through geometry. The concept of total moment of inertia being one-third of the sum of the individual moments (1/3(Ix + Iy + Iz)) is questioned, with uncertainty about its derivation and relation to the parallel axis theorem. The Pythagorean theorem is mentioned as a foundational concept for understanding the geometry involved. Overall, the user is looking for a clearer explanation of these key concepts in the context of their presentation.
dowjonez
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi

i have to give a presentation on an example of the defining equation for the moment of inertia of a thin spherical shell. I have to follow the example in my book "elements of Newtonian mechanics". I get most of it but there are a couple steps that the book skips that i cannot. I was wondering if anyone could better explain what's happening to me.


There is a thin spherical shell of mass M and radius R which is symetrically identical in the x, y and z coordinate system.

Ix = Iy = Iz

now Ix = integral (y^2 + z^2)dM i don't get this step.

R^2 = x^2 but i don't get the geometry of why x^2 = y^2 + z^2




Iy = integral (z^2 + x ^2)dM etc


now it says Itotal = 1/3(Ix + Iy + iz)

where does the 1/3 come from. Is it just taking the average or does it have to do with the parrallel axis theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if you have figures in your text, but I can't see them.Supposing I understood the situation correctly, the answer to your problem(s) would be the Pythagorean theorem.
 
yeah i understand that now. I still don't get why the total inertia is 1/3(Ix + Iy + iz) though
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top