Momentum and Energy Conservation in Collision Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter AverteProxy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving collision problems involving momentum and energy conservation. For the sledder on the hill, the initial velocity of 5 m/s should be added to the final velocity calculated from energy conservation, which is 19.8 m/s. In the elastic collision with the rock, both conservation of momentum and energy must be applied to find the correct final velocities, rather than relying solely on kinetic energy. The second problem regarding the hockey puck's change in momentum was correctly identified as 5 Kg-m/s, as it rebounds with equal magnitude but opposite direction. Overall, the importance of using both conservation laws in collision problems is emphasized for accurate results.
AverteProxy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Had a test today and had to do these problems. I just want confirmation on whether or not I did it correctly.

(One) A sledder is at the top of a (frictionless) hill. He has an initial velocity of 5m/s, and his weight with the sled is 30 Kg.

B) What his his velocity at the bottom of the hill?
c) At the bottom of the hill, the sledder collides in an elastic collision with a 90kg rock. What is the velocity of the rock after the collision?

(Two) A hockey puck hits a wall perpendicularly with a momentum of 2.5 Kg-m/s and rebounds with the exactly same speed. What is the overall change of momentum?



Homework Equations



P = mv
(1/2)Kv^2
PE = MGH




The Attempt at a Solution




On the first part, I set KE = to PE and did this to find the final velocity:

\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh

Masses cancel out and I'm left with \frac{1}{2}v^2 = gh

After working it out, I end up getting 19.8 m/s. Problem is, I don't know whether or not I would add the initial velocity to this answer.

After, I set KE of the sledder equal to the KE of the rock (elastic collision) and solved for the final velocity of the rock, and somehow get 11 m/s. Would this be correct?

For the second problem, It was multiple choice, and I chose 5. Because it's going 2.5 one direction, and then rebounds to go -2.5 in the opposite direction with equal magnitude. Would 5 be correct? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just add the 5 m/s onto the answer. Rather, include the KE of the 5 m/s in the original calc:
energy at top = energy at bottom
mgh + ½m⋅v² = ½m⋅V²

The method for (b) is flawed, too. An elastic collision does not necessarily transfer all of the energy from one object to the other. Elastic just means no kinetic energy is lost. So you should use conservation of momentum AND conservation of energy to figure out the velocities of the masses after the collision. You need TWO equations to find TWO unknowns.

You got the second question right!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top